Literature DB >> 28584013

Efficacy and Safety of Quarter-Dose Blood Pressure-Lowering Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Alexander Bennett1, Clara K Chow1, Michael Chou1, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi1, Ruth Webster1, Abdul Salam1, Anushka Patel1, Bruce Neal1, David Peiris1, Jay Thakkar1, John Chalmers1, Mark Nelson1, Christopher Reid1, Graham S Hillis1, Mark Woodward1, Sarah Hilmer1, Tim Usherwood1, Simon Thom1, Anthony Rodgers2.   

Abstract

There is a critical need for blood pressure-lowering strategies that have greater efficacy and minimal side effects. Low-dose combinations hold promise in this regard, but there are few data on very-low-dose therapy. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with at least one quarter-dose and one placebo and standard-dose monotherapy arm. A search was conducted of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Registry, Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicinal Agency websites. Data on blood pressure and adverse events were pooled using a fixed-effect model, and bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias. The review included 42 trials involving 20 284 participants. Thirty-six comparisons evaluated quarter-dose with placebo and indicated a blood pressure reduction of -4.7/-2.4 mm Hg (P<0.001). Six comparisons were of dual quarter-dose therapy versus placebo, observing a -6.7/ -4.4 mm Hg (P<0.001) blood pressure reduction. There were no trials of triple quarter-dose combination versus placebo, but one quadruple quarter-dose study observed a blood pressure reduction of -22.4/-13.1 mm Hg versus placebo (P<0.001). Compared with standard-dose monotherapy, the blood pressure differences achieved by single (37 comparisons), dual (7 comparisons), and quadruple (1 trial) quarter-dose combinations were +3.7/+2.6 (P<0.001), +1.3/-0.3 (NS), and -13.1/-7.9 (P<0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In terms of adverse events, single and dual quarter-dose therapy was not significantly different from placebo and had significantly fewer adverse events compared with standard-dose monotherapy. Quarter-dose combinations could provide improvements in efficacy and tolerability of blood pressure-lowering therapy.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; hypertension; meta-analysis; pharmacology; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28584013     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  9 in total

Review 1.  Position statement on use of pharmacological combinations in a single pill for treatment of hypertension by Argentine Federation of Cardiology (FAC) and Argentine Society of Hypertension (SAHA).

Authors:  Nicolás Renna; Daniel Piskorz; Diego Stisman; Diego Martinez; Ludmila Lescano; Sergio Vissani; Walter Espeche; Diego Marquez; Roberto Parodi; Diego Naninni; Marcos Baroni; Daniel Llanos; Rocio Martinez; Jessica Barochinner; Gustavo Staffieri; Fernando Lanas; Mónica Velásquez; Marcos Marin; Bryan Williams; Irene Ennis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 2.  How does pressure overload cause cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction? High-ouabain affinity cardiac Na+ pumps are crucial.

Authors:  Mordecai P Blaustein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Fixed and Low-Dose Combinations of Blood Pressure-Lowering Agents: For the Many or the Few?

Authors:  Massimo Leggio; Augusto Fusco; Claudia Loreti; Giorgio Limongelli; Maria Grazia Bendini; Andrea Mazza; Antonio Frizziero; Daniele Coraci; Luca Padua
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  [Novel options to maximize oral lipid lowering treatment : Role of bempedoic acid in combination treatment].

Authors:  Andrea Baessler; Marcus Fischer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Efficacy and safety of low-dose antihypertensive combination of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, phase II trial.

Authors:  Ki-Chul Sung; Jung Hoon Sung; Eun Joo Cho; Jeong Cheon Ahn; Seung Hwan Han; Weon Kim; Kye Hun Kim; Il Suk Sohn; Jinho Shin; Seok Yeon Kim; Kwang-Il Kim; Seok Min Kang; Sung-Ji Park; Yong-Jin Kim; Joon-Han Shin; Seong-Mi Park; Chang-Gyu Park
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.885

6.  Improving Hypertension Control in Primary Care With the Measure Accurately, Act Rapidly, and Partner With Patients Protocol.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Susan E Sutherland; Michael Rakotz; Jianing Yang; R Bruce Hanlin; Robert A Davis; Gregory Wozniak
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Low-Dose Triple Antihypertensive Combination Therapy in Patients with Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Study.

Authors:  Soon Jun Hong; Ki-Chul Sung; Sang-Wook Lim; Seok-Yeon Kim; Weon Kim; Jinho Shin; Sungha Park; Hae-Young Kim; Moo-Yong Rhee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 8.  Patient Centric Pharmaceutical Drug Product Design-The Impact on Medication Adherence.

Authors:  Enrica Menditto; Valentina Orlando; Giuseppe De Rosa; Paola Minghetti; Umberto Maria Musazzi; Caitriona Cahir; Marta Kurczewska-Michalak; Przemysław Kardas; Elísio Costa; José Manuel Sousa Lobo; Isabel F Almeida
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Ultra-low-dose quadruple combination blood pressure-lowering therapy in patients with hypertension: The QUARTET randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Clara K Chow; Emily R Atkins; Laurent Billot; John Chalmers; Graham S Hillis; Peter Hay; Bruce Neal; Mark Nelson; Anushka Patel; Christopher M Reid; Markus Schlaich; Tim Usherwood; Ruth Webster; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.749

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.