Literature DB >> 28583893

Clinicopathologic features, surgical treatments, and outcomes of small bowel tumors: A retrospective study in China.

Shuisheng Zhang1, Cuiling Zheng2, Yingtai Chen3, Quan Xu4, Jie Ma5, Wei Yuan6, Qinglong Jiang7, Yajie Zhao8, Jianwei Zhang9, Xu Che10, Chengfeng Wang11, Xiaozhun Huang12, Fang Chen13, Nianchang Wang14, Xiao Ma15, Zhongmin Lan16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small bowel tumors are relatively rare. Accumulation of data regarding their clinical presentation, pathologic features, prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and outcome has been an issue. We summarize the clinicopathologic features and evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with small bowel tumors who underwent surgery.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of medical records of 456 patients with small bowel tumors treated surgically at a Cancer Hospital between 1999 and 2016.
RESULTS: The study included 275 males (60.3%) and 181 females (39.7%). Small bowel tumors were difficult to diagnose because of non-specific symptoms. The most common symptoms were alimentary symptoms (56.8%) and abdominal pain (37.3%). Final histopathology revealed 241 adenocarcinomas (52.9%), 153 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs; 33.6%), 16 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs; 3.5%), and 46 other types of tumors (10.1%). The 456 surgeries performed included 153 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 241 limited duodenum resections, 60 palliative bypass surgeries, and 2 abdominal explorations. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates for patients with small bowel tumor were 57.2% and 44.6%, respectively. Adenocarcinomas resulted in the worst overall survival compared to GISTs or NETs, and tumors with duodenal location resulted in a worse survival compared to those with non-duodenal location.
CONCLUSION: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for small bowel tumors. Adenocarcinomas and duodenal involvement seem to contribute to poor outcomes.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overall survival; Pathological feature; Progression-free survival; Small bowel tumor; Surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28583893     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Prognosis and nomogram for predicting postoperative survival of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study in China and the SEER database.

Authors:  Sujing Jiang; Rongjie Zhao; Yiran Li; Xufeng Han; Zhen Liu; Weiting Ge; Ying Dong; Weidong Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jianzhang Wu; Ping Shu; Hongyong He; Haojie Li; Zhaoqing Tang; Yihong Sun; Fenglin Liu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-12-28

Review 3.  Molecular factors, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors: An update.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodoros Pavlidis; Theodoros Efstathios Pavlidis
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Clinicopathological features, surgical treatments, and survival outcomes of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shuisheng Zhang; Wei Yuan; Jianwei Zhang; Yingtai Chen; Cuiling Zheng; Jie Ma; Qinglong Jiang; Yajie Zhao; Quan Xu; Chengfeng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine: Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment Research.

Authors:  Fangxing Peng; Yao Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.