Literature DB >> 28583645

Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT with perfusion imaging in the quantitative assessment of tumor response to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A feasibility study.

Davide Ippolito1, Giulia Querques2, Stefano Okolicsanyi3, Cammillo Talei Franzesi2, Mario Strazzabosco4, Sandro Sironi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of perfusion-CT (p-CT) measurements in quantitative assessment of hemodynamic changes related to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with advanced HCC underwent p-CT study (256-MDCT scanner) before and 2 months after sorafenib administration. Dedicated perfusion software generated a quantitative map of arterial and portal perfusion and calculated the following perfusion parameters in target liver lesion: hepatic perfusion (HP), time-to-peak (TTP), blood volume (BV), arterial perfusion (AP), and hepatic perfusion index (HPI). After the follow-up scan, patients were categorized as responders and non-responders, according to mRECIST. Perfusion values were analyzed and compared in HCC lesions and in the cirrhotic parenchyma (n=22), such as between baseline and follow-up in progressors and non-progressors.
RESULTS: Before treatment, all mean perfusion values were significantly higher in HCC lesions than in the cirrhotic parenchyma (HP 47.8±17.2 vs 13.3±6.3mL/s per 100g; AP 47.9±18.1 vs 12.9±10.7mL/s; p<0.001). The group that responded to sorafenib (n=17) showed a significant reduction of values in HCC target lesions after therapy (HP 29.2±23.3 vs 48.1±15.1; AP 29.4±24.6 vs 49.2±17.4; p<0.01), in comparison with the non-responder group (n=5) that demonstrated no significant variation before and after treatment of HP (46.9±25.1 vs 46.7±24.1) and AP (43.4±21.7 vs 43.5±24.6). Among the responder group, HP percentage variation (Δ) in target lesions, during treatment, showed a significantly different (p=0.04) ΔHP in the group with complete response (79%) compared to the group with partial response or stable disease (16%).
CONCLUSIONS: p-CT technique can be used for HCC quantitative assessment of changes related to anti-angiogenic therapy. Identification of response predictors might help clinicians in selection of patients who may benefit from targeted-therapy allowing for optimization of individualized treatment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-angiogenic treatment; Cirrhosis; Computed tomography; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Perfusion imaging; Quantitative imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28583645     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

1.  Liver CT perfusion: which is the relevant delay that reduces radiation dose and maintains diagnostic accuracy?

Authors:  Alessandro Bevilacqua; Silvia Malavasi; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Non-measurable infiltrative HCC: is post-contrast attenuation on CT a sign of tumor response?

Authors:  Hasmik Koulakian; Wassim Allaham; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Advanced CT techniques for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Yukiko Honda; Fuminari Tatsugami; Chihiro Tani; Wataru Fukumoto; Keigo Narita; Shota Kondo; Motonori Akagi; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Evaluation of perfusion CT and dual-energy CT for predicting microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Maïté Lewin; Astrid Laurent-Bellue; Christophe Desterke; Adina Radu; Joëlle Ann Feghali; Jad Farah; Hélène Agostini; Jean-Charles Nault; Eric Vibert; Catherine Guettier
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 5.  Updates on Imaging of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Ana Kadivar; Ihab R Kamel; Atif Zaheer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Imaging evaluation of sorafenib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tianying Zheng; Hanyu Jiang; Yi Wei; Zixing Huang; Jie Chen; Ting Duan; Bin Song
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  How rapid advances in imaging are defining the future of precision radiation oncology.

Authors:  Laura Beaton; Steve Bandula; Mark N Gaze; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  CT Perfusion in Patients with Lung Cancer: Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Show a Different Blood Flow.

Authors:  Alessandro Bevilacqua; Giampaolo Gavelli; Serena Baiocco; Domenico Barone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Noninvasive imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: From diagnosis to prognosis.

Authors:  Han-Yu Jiang; Jie Chen; Chun-Chao Xia; Li-Kun Cao; Ting Duan; Bin Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  RAF1 Expression is Correlated with HAF, a Parameter of Liver Computed Tomographic Perfusion, and may Predict the Early Therapeutic Response to Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Ninzi Tian; Dong Wu; Ming Tang; Huichuan Sun; Yuan Ji; Cheng Huang; Lingli Chen; Gang Chen; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2020-03-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.