| Literature DB >> 28583158 |
Myriam Oudni-M'rad1, Raja Chaâbane-Banaoues2, Selim M'rad2, Fatma Trifa3, Habib Mezhoud2, Hamouda Babba2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although data on the parasite environmental contamination are crucial to implement strategies for control and treatment, information about zoonotic helminths is very limited in Tunisia. Contamination of areas with canid faeces harboring infective parasite elements represents a relevant health-risk impact for humans. The aim of this study was to assess the environmental contamination with eggs and oocysts of gastrointestinal parasites of dogs and wild canids in Tunisia with special attention to those that can be transmitted to humans.Entities:
Keywords: Canids; Environmental parasite contamination; Gastrointestinal parasites; Tunisia; Zoonosis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28583158 PMCID: PMC5460421 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2208-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Faecal sampling collections from dogs and wild canids in different Tunisian locations according to the climate: humid (blue), sub-humid (turquoise), semi-arid (green), Arid (brown), desertic (yellow)
Parasite contamination index of dog faeces in relation to regions and climate
| Climate | Sub-humid | Semi-arid | Arid | Desertic | Overall contamination index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locality | Kef | Kasserine | Monastir | Sousse | Metlaoui | Zarzis | Djerba | Tataouine | Douz |
| |
| Parasite | % ( | % ( | % ( | % ( | % ( | % ( | % ( | % ( | % ( | ||
|
| 16.7 (6) | 17.4 (23) | 30.5 (29) | 17.3 (14) | 29.3 (115) | 17.8 (23) | 51.2 (65) | 21.3 (22) | 26.8 (47) | <0.00001 | 27.2 (344) |
| Taeniidae | 8.3 (3) | 18.9 (25) | 10.5 (10) | 13.6 (11) | 44.6 (175) | 17.8 (23) | 29.1 (37) | 14.6 (15) | 28.5 (50) | <0.00001 | 27.4 (349) |
|
| 8.3 (3) | 18.2 (24) | 9.6 (9) | 12.3 (10) | 41.3 (162) | 17.8 (23) | 27.6 (35) | 14.6 (15) | 26.8 (47) | <0.00001 | 25.8 (328) |
|
| 52.8 (19) | 0.7 (1) | 20 (19) | 16 (13) | 0 (0) | 2.3 (3) | 3.1 (4) | 0 (0) | 1.1 (2) | <0.00001 | 4.8 (61) |
|
| 5.5 (2) | 6.8 (9) | 4.2 (4) | 8.6 (7) | 3.7 (14) | 5.4 (7) | 5.5 (7) | 8.7 (9) | 0 (0) | 0.0193 | 4.6 (59) |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.8 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.3549 | 0.1 (1) |
|
| 5.5 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.0013 | 0.2 (3) |
|
| 0 (0) | 0.7 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.3746 | 0.1 (1) |
| Coccidia | 38.9 (14) | 24.2 (32) | 26.3 (25) | 4.9 (4) | 15.5 (61) | 10.1 (13) | 8.7 (11) | 0.9 (1) | 2.8 (5) | <0.00001 | 13.1 (166) |
a E. granulosus eggs were identified on biomolecular basis
Abbreviations: N Number of faecal samples analysed, n Number of positive samples, % Percentage of positive samples
Fig. 2Cestode and nematode eggs and oocysts observed in the canid faecal samples. a D. caninum egg-capsule. b Trichuris spp. c Capillaria spp. d Spirocerca spp. e Ancylostoma spp. f Toxocara spp. g Taeniidae. h Coccidian oocysts
Intestinal parasites in canids based on eggs and oocysts recovered in the faeces from Djerba-Zarzis regions
| Dogs | Wild canids | Dogs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % ( | % ( | Chi-square test |
| |
|
| 34.3 (88) | 16.3 (17) | 11.63 | 0.0006 |
| Taeniidae | 23.4 (60) | 0 (0) | 29.25 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 22.6 (58) | 0 (0) | 28.95 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 5.4 (14) | 3.8 (4) | 0.41 | 0.5219 |
|
| 2.7 (7) | 6.3 (7) | 3.16 | 0.0754 |
|
| 0.4 (1) | 9.6 (10) | 21.25 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0 (0) | 1.9 (2) | 4.95 | 0.0260 |
| Coccidia | 9.3 (24) | 7.7 (8) | 0.25 | 0.6108 |
a E. granulosus eggs were identified on biomolecular basis
Abbreviations: N Number of faecal samples analysed, n Number of positive samples, % Percentage of positive samples
Fig. 3Parasite contamination indices and Tunisian region bioclimatic characteristics described by principal component analysis. Temperature (C°): annual average maximum temperature; Rainfall (mm): annual average rainfall