| Literature DB >> 28582961 |
Sheng Wang1, Jin Jie Li2, Yanbing Lv2, Ruili Wu2, Ming Xing3, Huaibin Shen2, Hongzhe Wang2, Lin Song Li2, Xia Chen4.
Abstract
We report a phosphine-free one-pot method to synthesize ZnSe/CdS/ZnS core-shell quantum dots (QDs) with composite type-II/type-I structures and consequent reabsorption suppression properties. The as-synthesized QDs possess high efficient red emission (with quantum yield of 82%) and high optical stability. Compared to type-I QDs, the ZnSe/CdS/ZnS QDs show larger Stokes shift and lower reabsorption which can reduce the emission loss and improve the level of fluorescence output. The ZnSe/CdS/ZnS QDs are used as fluorescent labels to exploit their application in fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay (FLISA) for the first time in the detection of C-reactive protein (CRP) with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.85 ng/mL, which is more sensitive than that of CdSe/ZnS type-I QDs based FLISA (1.00 ng/mL). The results indicate that the ZnSe/CdS/ZnS type-II/type-I QDs may be good candidates for applications in biomedical information detection.Entities:
Keywords: FLISA; Quantitative immunoassay; Type-II/type-I quantum dot
Year: 2017 PMID: 28582961 PMCID: PMC5457375 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-2135-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1Evolution of the UV–vis absorption and PL spectra upon consecutive growth of ZnSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell QDs
Scheme 1The schematic structure (up) and the band alignment (bottom) for ZnSe/CdS/ZnS type-II/type-I QDs based on the corresponding abrupt and alloyed interfaces, respectively
Fig. 2Left: XRD patterns of ZnSe/CdS/ZnS type-II/type-I QDs with different shell growth stages. The diffraction lines for zinc blende (ZB) ZnSe (bottom), WZ CdS (middle), and WZ ZnS (top) are indexed. Right: the corresponding TEM and HRTEM (inset, bar of 5 nm) images of the ZnSe core (a), ZnSe/CdS type-II QDs with 2 ML (b), 4 ML (c) and 6 ML (d) CdS shell, respectively, and ZnSe/CdS/ZnS type-II/type-I QDs with 3 ML (E) and 6 ML (F), respectively
Fig. 3Stability test of hydrophobic QDs upon (a) repeated purification process steps; stability test of QDs-PMAO upon (b) BS buffer, (c) PH, and (d) temperature
Fig. 4Fluorescence spectra (a) and dynamic light scattering (b) of the QDs-PMAO and QDs-mAb in buffer
Fig. 5Photoluminescence spectra of FLISA for determination of different concentration of CRP antigen (a) and the standard curves (b)
Recovery tests for CRP determination
| Sample | Experimental value (ng/mL) | Theoretical value (ng/mL) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 288.53 | 300 | 96.18 |
| P2 | 148.73 | 150 | 99.15 |
| P3 | 74.99 | 75 | 99.99 |
| P4 | 26.32 | 25 | 105.90 |
| P5 | 4.18 | 5 | 83.61 |