Literature DB >> 28582610

Protein Corona: Impact of Lymph Versus Blood in a Complex In Vitro Environment.

Debora Bonvin1, Ulrich Aschauer2, Duncan T L Alexander3, Diego Chiappe4, Marc Moniatte4, Heinrich Hofmann1, Marijana Mionić Ebersold1,5,6.   

Abstract

In biological environments, the surface of nanoparticles (NPs) are modified by protein corona (PC) that determines their biological behavior. Unfortunately, in vitro tests still give different PC than in vivo tests causing in vitro-in vivo discrepancy; hence, in vitro studies are not indicative for the NPs' behavior in vivo. Here is demonstrated that PC in vitro is strongly influenced by the type of extracellular fluid (ECF), blood or lymph, by their high and low flow conditions and transitions between ECFs, and a combination of these parameters. As a result, this in vitro study approaches fluidic and dynamic variations to which NPs are exposed in vivo: different ECF that NPs encounter first in different injection routes, different transitions in-between ECFs during circulation, and simultaneous change in the exposed flow in these transitions. The most-abundant proteins in PCs are found to be not the most abundant in ECFs, but those having high affinity for binding to the surface of NPs. Moreover, some proteins are differently abundant in PCs at different flows, which indicate force-promoted binding, catch bonds. These results suggest that future in vitro studies should consider more complex incubation conditions to improve the in vitro-in vivo consistency necessary for translational research.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  extracellular fluid; in vitro incubation; lymph; nanoparticles; protein corona

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28582610     DOI: 10.1002/smll.201700409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Small        ISSN: 1613-6810            Impact factor:   13.281


  8 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Bioequivalence Is Unlikely to Equal Target Site Bioequivalence for Nanotechnology Oncologic Products.

Authors:  Jessie L-S Au; Ze Lu; Roberto A Abbiati; M Guillaume Wientjes
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Formation of a protein corona influences the biological identity of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel Nierenberg; Annette R Khaled; Orielyz Flores
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-05-28

Review 3.  Target Site Delivery and Residence of Nanomedicines: Application of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.

Authors:  Jessie L-S Au; Roberto A Abbiati; M Guillaume Wientjes; Ze Lu
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Versatility of Pyridoxal Phosphate as a Coating of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Debora Bonvin; Ulrich J Aschauer; Jessica A M Bastiaansen; Matthias Stuber; Heinrich Hofmann; Marijana Mionić Ebersold
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Improving nanotherapy delivery and action through image-guided systems pharmacology.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; Michelle A Garlin; Ralph Weissleder; Miles A Miller
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 6.  Progress and Hurdles of Therapeutic Nanosystems against Cancer.

Authors:  Marina Martín-Contreras; Saúl A Navarro-Marchal; José Manuel Peula-García; Ana Belén Jódar-Reyes
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 7.  Isolation methods for particle protein corona complexes from protein-rich matrices.

Authors:  Linda Böhmert; Linn Voß; Valerie Stock; Albert Braeuning; Alfonso Lampen; Holger Sieg
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 8.  In vivo protein corona on nanoparticles: does the control of all material parameters orient the biological behavior?

Authors:  Nimisha Singh; Célia Marets; Julien Boudon; Nadine Millot; Lucien Saviot; Lionel Maurizi
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-01-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.