Literature DB >> 28581860

Energy Use During the Development of a Lecithotrophic and a Planktotrophic Echinoid.

O Hoegh-Guldberg, R B Emlet.   

Abstract

The energy required for development was measured in two closely related echinoids with differing modes of development. Heliocidaris tuberculata hatches from a 95-{mu}m egg (~0.1 {mu}g dry organic mass) and develops via a planktotrophic larva over 21-30 days into a juvenile (5.3-7.5 {mu}g). H. erythrogramma hatches from a ~400 {mu}m egg (11.6-19.0 {mu}g) and develops over 3.5-4 days via a lecithotrophic larva into a juvenile with a mass not detectably different from that of the egg. Oxygen consumption increased exponentially in H. tuberculata and peaked at about 200-500 pmol indiv-1 h-1, whereas the oxygen consumption of H. erythrogramma increased rapidly, reaching a plateau at about 800 pmol indiv-1 h-1 on the second day. Metabolic energy expenditure for development to metamorphosis was twofold higher for H. tuberculata (52-60 mJ indiv-1) than for H. erythrogramma (26-35 mJ indiv-1). The interspecific comparison suggests that about half the metabolic expenditure for planktotrophic development goes toward building and operating the larval feeding apparatus and that the return on this investment is 400%-600% over the larval period. When the energy equivalents of the organic masses of the juveniles are included, the energy for constructing a juvenile on a per mass basis is essentially the same for both species (cf. H. tuberculata: 37-42 mJ {mu}g-1; H. erythrogramma: 34-36 mJ {mu}g-1) and implies the absence of developmentally based energetic barriers or benefits to changes in modes of development. Substantial amounts of metabolically inactive material may be present in embryos with nonfeeding development and should be considered in physiological measurements and comparisons.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 28581860     DOI: 10.2307/1542573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Bull        ISSN: 0006-3185            Impact factor:   1.818


  4 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of egg provisioning using mass spectrometry during rapid life history evolution in sea urchins.

Authors:  Phillip L Davidson; J Will Thompson; Matthew W Foster; M Arthur Moseley; Maria Byrne; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Morphogenetic mechanisms of coelom formation in the direct-developing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma.

Authors:  Margaret S Smith; Steve Collins; Rudolf A Raff
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Direct and latent effects of ocean acidification on the transition of a sea urchin from planktonic larva to benthic juvenile.

Authors:  Narimane Dorey; Emanuela Butera; Nadjejda Espinel-Velasco; Sam Dupont
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Relationships among egg size, composition, and energy: a comparative study of geminate sea urchins.

Authors:  Justin S McAlister; Amy L Moran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.