Literature DB >> 28581367

Carbohydrate mouth rinse improves morning high-intensity exercise performance.

Neil D Clarke1, Scott Hammond1, Evangelos Kornilios1, Peter D Mundy1.   

Abstract

Oral carbohydrate (CHO) rinsing has been demonstrated to provide beneficial effects on exercise performance of durations of up to one hour. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of CHO mouth rinsing on morning high-intensity exercise performance. Following institutional ethical approval and familiarisation, 12 healthy males (mean ± SD age: 23 ± 3 years, height: 175.5 ± 7.4 cm, body mass: 75.4 ± 7.5 kg) participated in this study. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height, isometric mid-thigh pull peak force, 10 m sprint time and bench press and back squat repetitions to failure were assessed following CHO and placebo (PLA) rinsing or a control condition (CON). All testing took place at 07:30 following an 11 hour overnight fast. Performance of CMJ height (CHO: 39 ± 7 cm; PLA: 38 ± 7 cm; CON: 36 ± 6 cm; P = .003, [Formula: see text] = 0.40), 10 m sprint time (CHO: 1.78 ± 0.07 s; PLA: 1.81 ± 0.07 s; CON: 1.85 ± 0.05 s; P = .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.47), the number of bench press (CHO: 25 ± 3; PLA: 24 ± 4; CON: 22 ± 4; P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.55) and squat (CHO: 31 ± 4; PLA: 29 ± 5; CON: 26 ± 6; P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.70) repetitions and mean felt arousal (CHO: 5 ± 1; PLA: 4 ± 0; CON: 4 ± 0; P = .009, [Formula: see text] = 0.25) improved following CHO rinsing. However, isometric mid-thigh pull peak force was unchanged (CHO: 2262 ± 288 N; PLA: 2236 ± 354 N; CON: 2212 ± 321 N; P = .368, [Formula: see text] = 0.08). These results suggest that oral CHO rinsing solution significantly improved the morning performance of CMJ height, 10 m sprint times, bench press and squat repetitions to failure and felt arousal, although peak force during an isometric mid-thigh pull, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate were unaffected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maltodextrin; arousal; oral receptors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28581367     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1333159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Narrative Review of Current Concerns and Future Perspectives of the Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Effects on Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Vitor de Salles Painelli; Cayque Brietzke; Paulo Estevão Franco-Alvarenga; Raul Canestri; Ítalo Vinícius; Flávio Oliveira Pires
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Efficacy of Carbohydrate Ingestion on CrossFit Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Jaden A Rountree; Ben M Krings; Timothy J Peterson; Adam G Thigpen; Matthew J McAllister; Megan E Holmes; JohnEric W Smith
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-14

Review 3.  Fundamentals of glycogen metabolism for coaches and athletes.

Authors:  Bob Murray; Christine Rosenbloom
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Different Doses of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Have No Effect on Exercise Performance in Resistance Trained Women.

Authors:  Raci Karayigit; Scott C Forbes; Alireza Naderi; Darren G Candow; Ulas C Yildirim; Firat Akca; Dicle Aras; Burak C Yasli; Aysegul Sisman; Ahmet Mor; Mojtaba Kaviani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Increases High but Not Low Intensity Repetitions to Failure in Resistance-Trained Males.

Authors:  Raci Karayigit; Mustafa Can Eser; Fatih Gur; Cengizhan Sari; Ladislav Cepicka; Tomasz Gabrys
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.