| Literature DB >> 28581167 |
Rob DeSalle1, Alan R Templeton1.
Abstract
The nearly-neutral-mutation theory predicts that populations with small effective sizes will undergo more rapid molecular evolution than populations with very large effective sizes. In particular, Ohta (1976) predicted that populations of Hawaiian Drosophila that are known to have small population sizes and to experience repeated population bottlenecks due to founder events should show a more rapid rate of molecular evolution relative to the rate of molecular evolution of species with large population sizes such as the continental Drosophila. In this paper we test this prediction by comparing the rate of molecular evolution in two closely related lineages of Hawaiian Drosophila that have experienced very different evolutionary histories. Both lineages belong to the planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. The beta lineage (which includes D. silvestris, D. planitibia, D. differens, and D. hemipeza) has undergone repeated founder events, as evidenced by their geographic distribution and behavioral biology. On the other hand, evidence on geographic distribution and behavior indicates that the alpha lineage (which includes D. melanocephala, D. cyrtaloma, and D. neoperkinsi) has arisen from large ancestral populations without founder effects. The mitochondrial DNA data reveal that, within a lineage, the rate of molecular evolution is rather uniform, while all comparisons between the two lineages show that the rate of molecular evolution in the beta lineage is three times that of the alpha lineage. This analysis strongly supports the predictions made by Ohta. © 1988 The Society for the Study of Evolution.Entities:
Year: 1988 PMID: 28581167 DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02525.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evolution ISSN: 0014-3820 Impact factor: 3.694