| Literature DB >> 28580936 |
Q Niu1, W C Yu1, K Y Yip1, Z L Lim1, H Kotegawa2, E Matsuoka2, H Sugawara2, H Tou2, Y Yanase3, Swee K Goh1.
Abstract
In conventional metals, modification of electron trajectories under magnetic field gives rise to a magnetoresistance that varies quadratically at low field, followed by a saturation at high field for closed orbits on the Fermi surface. Deviations from the conventional behaviour, for example, the observation of a linear magnetoresistance, or a non-saturating magnetoresistance, have been attributed to exotic electron scattering mechanisms. Recently, linear magnetoresistance has been observed in many Dirac materials, in which the electron-electron correlation is relatively weak. The strongly correlated helimagnetEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28580936 PMCID: PMC5465317 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Transverse magnetoresistance in pressure-tuned CrAs.
(a) Schematic temperature–pressure phase diagram showing the helimagnetic region, the superconducting region (SC) and the paramagnetic region (PM), constructed using the data in ref. 14. The area bounded by dashed lines indicates the region with coexistence of magnetism and superconductivity. The open squares denote the experimental data of the current work, which are consistent with the previously published data1415. For clarity, the values of Tc are multiplied by 30. The position of CrP is determined by taking into account the chemical pressure effect of P on CrAs. The crystal structure of CrAs, prepared using VESTA42, is shown in the inset. (b–d) Magnetoresistance, defined as MR=[ρ(H)−ρ(0)]/ρ(0) × 100%, from −14 to 14 T at pA, p1, and pCrP, collected at 25.7, 15.5 and 16.2 mK, respectively. For the data collected in the superconducting state, the magnetoresistance is calculated using a zero-field resistivity ρ(0) estimated from a smooth extrapolation of the data above Hc2. (e) High-field magnetoresistance in CrP, shown as the green rectangle in d, with steep background subtracted. The left and the right arrows are at 13 and 14 T, respectively. Clear Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations can be seen. (f) Fast Fourier transform of the oscillatory signal in e from 8 to 14 T.
Figure 2Magnetoresistance of CrAs under pressure.
(a–d) Magnetoresistance of CrAs over a wide temperature range at p1, p2, p3 and p5. The spikes at some traces are experimental artefacts. (e) Magnetoresistance at p2 (solid lines) and p4 (dashed lines). The traces at p4 are multiplied by 1.62, which is the ratio RRR(p2)/RRR(p4). (f) The field dependence of the resistance at p2 on logarithmic scales, showing the determination of the crossing over field μ0H*. (g) The temperature dependence of μ0H* (squares) at p2, which can be described by μ0H*=a(T+b)3/2 (solid line).
Figure 3Comparison of the band structure of CrAs at 14.3 kbar and CrP.
(a,b) Dispersion relation along several high-symmetry directions for CrAs at 14.3 kbar. An expanded view of the band structure near EF around Y (indicated by the circle) is shown, where a band crossing is found ∼8.6 meV below the Fermi energy. The dispersion is linear along Y–Γ and parabolic along Y–S. (c) The first Brillouin zone of CrAs/CrP with the relevant high-symmetry points labelled. (d,e) Dispersion relation for CrP. A similar band structure is found in CrP near Y, but with a crossing point located at ∼47 meV below EF instead.
Figure 4H–T scaling in CrAs at 13.1 kbar.
The magnetoresistance replotted as [ρ(H, T)−ρ(0, 0)]/T against μ0H/T. The data below 3.0 K can all be described by a single curve A(1+Bx2)0.5 (thick solid curve), which has the same functional form as equation (3). Note that the axes are on logarithmic scales, and the dashed line indicates a unity slope.