Sally Nguyen1, François Thuot1,2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. 2. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Québec - Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major muscle flaps (PMMFs) and fasciocutaneous free flaps (FFFs) are commonly used for reconstruction of the surgical defect after salvage total laryngectomy. This study compared swallowing function in patients who underwent reconstruction with either PMMF or FFF. METHODS: This study was based on a retrospective cohort of patients treated at the CHU de Québec between January 2000 and March 2015. Demographics, chemoradiation data, surgical protocol, pathologic results, complications, evolution, esophageal dilation, diet intake, and feeding tube dependence were documented. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were analyzed (93 PMMFs and 33 FFFs). Of the patients who received PMMFs, 38.7% had a limited oral intake compared to 15.2% of patients who received FFFs (odds ratio [OR] 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-9.99; P = .02). The need for esophageal dilation tended to be greater for PMMF patients (25% vs 9%; OR 3.38; 95% CI 0.94-12.13; P = .06). Complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION: The FFF reconstruction led to better results in terms of swallowing function than PMMF reconstruction.
BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major muscle flaps (PMMFs) and fasciocutaneous free flaps (FFFs) are commonly used for reconstruction of the surgical defect after salvage total laryngectomy. This study compared swallowing function in patients who underwent reconstruction with either PMMF or FFF. METHODS: This study was based on a retrospective cohort of patients treated at the CHU de Québec between January 2000 and March 2015. Demographics, chemoradiation data, surgical protocol, pathologic results, complications, evolution, esophageal dilation, diet intake, and feeding tube dependence were documented. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were analyzed (93 PMMFs and 33 FFFs). Of the patients who received PMMFs, 38.7% had a limited oral intake compared to 15.2% of patients who received FFFs (odds ratio [OR] 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-9.99; P = .02). The need for esophageal dilation tended to be greater for PMMF patients (25% vs 9%; OR 3.38; 95% CI 0.94-12.13; P = .06). Complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION: The FFF reconstruction led to better results in terms of swallowing function than PMMF reconstruction.
Authors: Armando De Virgilio; Andrea Costantino; Giuseppe Mercante; Fabio Ferreli; Bianca Maria Festa; Elena Russo; Luca Malvezzi; Raul Pellini; Giovanni Colombo; Giuseppe Spriano Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Linke Li; Jing Wang; Di Deng; Tian Shen; Weigang Gan; Feng Xu; Jifeng Liu; Dan Lv; Bo Li; Ji Wang; Jun Wang; Fei Chen; Jun Liu Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 1.817