Haoli Xu1, Rui Li1, Yuxia Duan1, Jincheng Wang1, Shuailiang Liu1, Yue Zhang1, Wenwen He1, Xiaotao Qin1, Guoquan Cao1, Yunjun Yang1, Qichuan Zhuge2, Jun Yang3, Weijian Chen4. 1. Molecular and Digital Medical Imaging Institute/Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbai Xiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, China. 2. Zhenjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Aging and Neurological Disorder Research, Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbai Xiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, China. 3. GE Healthcare China, Shanghai, China. kevin_yang@ge.com. 4. Molecular and Digital Medical Imaging Institute/Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbai Xiang Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, China. wyyycwj@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage aggravates perihematomal edema, and edema volume predicts prognosis independently. But the BBB permeability at the late stage of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients is uncertain. We aimed to assess the BBB permeability of spontaneous basal ganglia ICH using computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) and investigates its relationship with hematoma and perihematomal edema volume. METHODS: We performed CTP on 54 consecutive ICH patients within 24 to 72 h after symptom onset. Permeability-surface area product (PS) derived from CTP imaging was measured in hematoma, "high-PS spot," perihematoma, normal-appearing, hemispheric, and contralateral regions. Hematoma and edema volumes were calculated from non-contrast CT. RESULTS: "High-PS spot" and perihematoma regions had higher PS than the contralateral regions (p < 0.001). Hematoma PS was lower than that in the contralateral regions (p < 0.001). Perihematoma PS of the large-hematoma group was higher than that of the small-hematoma group (p = 0.011). Perihematomal edema volume correlated positively with hematoma volume (β = 0.864, p < 0.001) and perihematoma PS (β = 0.478, p < 0.001). Perihematoma PS correlated positively with hematoma volume (β = 0.373, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Locally elevated perihematoma PS was found in most spontaneous basal ganglia ICH patients within 24 to 72 h after symptom onset. Perihematoma PS was higher in larger hematomas and was associated with larger edema volume. At this period, BBB leakage is likely to be an important factor in edema formation.
PURPOSE: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage aggravates perihematomal edema, and edema volume predicts prognosis independently. But the BBB permeability at the late stage of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients is uncertain. We aimed to assess the BBB permeability of spontaneous basal ganglia ICH using computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) and investigates its relationship with hematoma and perihematomal edema volume. METHODS: We performed CTP on 54 consecutive ICHpatients within 24 to 72 h after symptom onset. Permeability-surface area product (PS) derived from CTP imaging was measured in hematoma, "high-PS spot," perihematoma, normal-appearing, hemispheric, and contralateral regions. Hematoma and edema volumes were calculated from non-contrast CT. RESULTS: "High-PS spot" and perihematoma regions had higher PS than the contralateral regions (p < 0.001). Hematoma PS was lower than that in the contralateral regions (p < 0.001). Perihematoma PS of the large-hematoma group was higher than that of the small-hematoma group (p = 0.011). Perihematomal edema volume correlated positively with hematoma volume (β = 0.864, p < 0.001) and perihematoma PS (β = 0.478, p < 0.001). Perihematoma PS correlated positively with hematoma volume (β = 0.373, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Locally elevated perihematoma PS was found in most spontaneous basal ganglia ICHpatients within 24 to 72 h after symptom onset. Perihematoma PS was higher in larger hematomas and was associated with larger edema volume. At this period, BBB leakage is likely to be an important factor in edema formation.
Authors: Andrew F Ducruet; Brad E Zacharia; Zachary L Hickman; Bartosz T Grobelny; Mason L Yeh; Sergey A Sosunov; E Sander Connolly Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2009-07-24 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Charlotte Jj van Asch; Merel Ja Luitse; Gabriël Je Rinkel; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Ale Algra; Catharina Jm Klijn Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ken S Butcher; Tracey Baird; Lachlan MacGregor; Patricia Desmond; Brian Tress; Stephen Davis Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J W Dankbaar; J Hom; T Schneider; S-C Cheng; B C Lau; I van der Schaaf; S Virmani; S Pohlman; M Wintermark Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-02-28 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: Didem Aksoy; Roland Bammer; Michael Mlynash; Chitra Venkatasubramanian; Irina Eyngorn; Ryan W Snider; Sandeep N Gupta; Rashmi Narayana; Nancy Fischbein; Christine A C Wijman Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Maaike P Cliteur; Lotte Sondag; Axel Wolsink; Ingeborg Rasing; F J A Meijer; Wilmar M T Jolink; Marieke J H Wermer; Catharina J M Klijn; Floris H B M Schreuder Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Whitney M Freeze; Heidi I L Jacobs; Floris H B M Schreuder; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Walter H Backes; Frans R Verhey; Catharina J M Klijn Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 4.003