| Literature DB >> 28579971 |
Ya Wang1, Yongxin Li1, Huirong Wang2, Yanjun Chen1, Wenhua Huang1.
Abstract
Infantile spasms (IS) syndrome is an age-dependent epileptic encephalopathy, which occurs in children characterized by spasms, impaired consciousness, and hypsarrhythmia. Abnormalities in default mode network (DMN) might contribute to the loss of consciousness during seizures and cognitive deficits in children with IS. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the changes in DMN with functional connectivity (FC) and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), the two methods to discover the potential neuronal underpinnings of IS. The consistency of the two calculate methods of DMN abnormalities in IS patients was also our main focus. To avoid the disturbance of interictal epileptic discharge, our testing was performed within the interictal durations without epileptic discharges. Resting-state fMRI data were collected from 13 patients with IS and 35 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. FC analysis with seed in posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) was used to compare the differences between two groups. We chose PCC as the seed region because PCC is the only node in the DMN that directly interacts with virtually all other nodes according to previous studies. Furthermore, the ALFF values within the DMN were also calculated and compared between the two groups. The FC results showed that IS patients exhibited markedly reduced connectivity between posterior seed region and other areas within DMN. In addition, part of the brain areas within the DMN showing significant difference of FC had significantly lower ALFF signal in the patient group than that in the healthy controls. The observed disruption in DMN through the two methods showed that the coherence of brain signal fluctuation in DMN during rest was broken in IS children. Neuronal functional impairment or altered integration in DMN would be one neuroimaging characteristic, which might help us to understand the underlying neural mechanism of IS. Further studies are needed to determine whether the disturbed FC and ALFF observed in the DMN are related to cognitive performance in IS patients.Entities:
Keywords: amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; default mode network; epilepsy; functional connectivity; infantile spasm; resting-state fMRI; temporal lobe
Year: 2017 PMID: 28579971 PMCID: PMC5437852 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Characteristics of the IS patients.
| Patient | Sex | Age (months) | Onset time (months) | Type | Pathogeny | Seizure frequency (time/day) | Antiepileptic drugs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 23 | 4 | No lesion | No | 3–4 | LEV |
| 2 | M | 83 | 24 | No lesion | No | 10–20 | VPA TPM |
| 3 | F | 3 | 3 | Lesion | Brain cortex dysplasia | 5–10 | LEV OXC |
| 4 | M | 8 | 0.5 | Lesion | Temporal lobe cortex dysplasia | 1–2 | LEV VPA |
| 5 | M | 18 | 6 | Lesion | Cerebromalacia of right hemisphere | 3–15 | TPM |
| 6 | M | 20 | 13 | Lesion | Cerebromalacia of left hemisphere and right temporal lobe | 10–20 | VPA OXC |
| 7 | M | 82 | 24 | No lesion | Bilateral gray matter heterotopia | 1–2 | LEV TPM |
| 8 | M | 80 | 6 | Lesion | Cerebromalacia of left hemisphere | 3–4 | CBZ VPA |
| 9 | F | 13 | 5 | No lesion | Bilateral parietal-occipital cortex dysplasia | 7–10 | TPM LEV |
| 10 | M | 71 | 3 | No lesion | Signal of right anterior cingulate cortex abnormal | 1–2 | TPM LEV |
| 11 | M | 42 | 9 | Lesion | Signal of right mesial temporal lobe abnormal | 1–2 | LEV OXC |
| 12 | M | 5 | 5 | No lesion | Bilateral pachygyria deformity | 1 | TPM OXC |
| 13 | M | 7 | 7 | Lesion | Right temporal lobe lesion | 1–3 | LEV |
.
.
.
LEV, levetiracetam; VPA, valproic acid; TPM, topiramate; OXC, oxcarbazepine; CBZ, carbamazepine.
Figure 1. The bar to the right indicates the t score level. L, left; R, right.
Brain regions showing abnormal functional connectivity in IS patients.
| Brain region | MNI coordinates | Voxel number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients < controls | |||||
| Temporal_Mid_R | 48 | −9 | −18 | 5.54 | 443 |
| Temporal_Pole_Sup_R | 30 | 15 | −27 | 4.19 | |
| Temporal_Pole_Mid_R | 57 | 12 | −27 | 4.10 | |
| Frontal_Sup_R | 21 | 27 | 48 | 5.24 | 206 |
| Temporal_Mid_L | −54 | −9 | −15 | 4.66 | 221 |
| Temporal_Sup_L | −60 | 0 | −12 | 4.25 | |
| Anterior Cingulate R | 9 | 24 | −6 | 4.54 | 174 |
| Frontal_Med_Orb_L | −9 | 39 | −12 | 4.02 | |
| Rectus_R | 3 | 30 | −15 | 4.01 | |
| Lingual_R | 6 | −42 | 0 | 4.52 | 324 |
| Cingulate_Post_L | −9 | −48 | 21 | 4.02 | |
| Fusiform_R | 21 | −30 | −18 | 4.23 | 94 |
| Parahippocampa_R | 15 | −30 | −12 | 3.87 | |
| Hippocampus_R | 30 | −21 | −15 | 3.06 | |
| Hippocampus_L | −27 | −21 | −9 | 4.06 | 50 |
| Parahippocampal_L | −18 | −21 | −21 | 3.33 | |
| Frontal_Sup_Medial_L | 0 | 66 | 3 | 4.04 | 118 |
| Frontal_Med_Orb_R | 3 | 60 | −9 | 4.04 | |
| Cingulum_Ant_R | 6 | 48 | 21 | 3.94 | 251 |
| Frontal_Sup_Medial_L | −3 | 57 | 24 | 3.85 | |
| Frontal_Sup_Medial_R | 6 | 57 | 39 | 3.77 | |
| Corpus Callosum R | 18 | −39 | 21 | 3.66 | 46 |
| Precuneus_R | 15 | −45 | 30 | 3.36 | |
| Fusiform_L | −15 | −36 | −15 | 3.61 | 48 |
| Lingual_L | −12 | −33 | −6 | 3.35 | |
| Temporal_Pole_Sup_L | −42 | 21 | −30 | 3.40 | 17 |
| Temporal_Pole_Mid_L | −39 | 12 | −27 | 3.16 | |
| Temporal_Mid_L | −66 | −36 | 3 | 2.79 | 10 |
| Temporal_Sup_R | 69 | −36 | 12 | 2.78 | 10 |
MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; the MNI coordinates and t value for the local maxima of the centers of the voxel clusters; L, left; R, right.
Figure 2. The bar to the right indicates the t score level. L, left; R, right.
Brain regions showing abnormal ALFF in IS patients.
| Brain region | MNI coordinates | Voxel number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients < controls | |||||
| Middle occipital gyrus | 30 | −84 | 6 | 5.17 | 152 |
| Occipital_Mid_R | 24 | −93 | 6 | 4.87 | |
| Lingual_R | 24 | −69 | −3 | 4.23 | |
| Temporal lobe | −21 | −60 | 15 | 5.04 | 253 |
| ParaHippocampal_L | −27 | −42 | −9 | 4.80 | |
| Cingulum_Mid_L | 0 | −45 | 36 | 4.23 | |
| Occipital_Mid_L | −24 | −87 | 0 | 4.81 | 287 |
| Fusiform_L | −27 | −57 | −12 | 4.59 | |
| Lingual_L | −3 | −81 | 0 | 4.21 | |
| Precunneus_R | 18 | −54 | 21 | 4.67 | 66 |
| Paracentral_Lobule_L | 0 | −18 | 63 | 4.59 | 65 |
| Supp_Motor_Area_L | 0 | −12 | 51 | 3.57 | |
| ParaHippocampal_R | 27 | −36 | −12 | 4.43 | 50 |
| Lingual_R | 18 | −48 | −3 | 3.51 | |
| Temporal_Mid_L | −51 | −54 | 18 | 4.23 | 22 |
| Temporal_Mid_L | −54 | −66 | 9 | 4.12 | 61 |
| Temporal_Inf_L | −54 | −60 | −9 | 3.87 | |
| Temporal_Mid_L | −48 | −63 | 0 | 3.45 | |
| Angular_L | −42 | −69 | 48 | 4.11 | 62 |
| Occipital_Mid_L | −33 | −81 | 36 | 4.01 | |
| Occipital_Mid_L | −42 | −72 | 27 | 3.74 | |
| Temporal_Mid_R | 48 | −66 | 9 | 3.87 | 40 |
| Temporal_Inf_R | 45 | −66 | −6 | 3.78 | |
| Postcentral_L | −45 | −9 | 36 | 3.63 | 17 |
ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; the MNI coordinates and t value for the local maxima of the centers of the voxel clusters; L, left; R, right.
Figure 3The regions shown in Figures . FC, functional connectivity; L, left; R, right.