Literature DB >> 28579725

Cost-Savings From an Antipsychotic Tablet-Splitting Program.

Heather Carey, Mark Fondriest.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Newer atypical antipsychotics such as aripiprazole (Abilify, Otsuka) and lurasidone (Latuda, Sunovion) have favorable safety and efficacy profiles, but their use is limited by high cost. University Hospitals Richmond Medical Center initiated an antipsychotic tablet-splitting program in August 2015 to counter the costs based on the identical pricing structure of aripiprazole and lurasidone doses.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for all patients dispensed aripiprazole or lurasidone oral tablets from May 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015, to evaluate the potential cost-savings for our facility. Findings were extrapolated to 12 months to estimate an annual cost-savings from tablet splitting.
RESULTS: Two-hundred thirty-five charts were reviewed during this eight-month period. Estimated annual savings ranged from $3,617 for lurasidone 20-mg tablets to $6,637 for aripiprazole 5-mg tablets. The antipsychotic tablet-splitting program for lurasidone and aripiprazole resulted in 30% to 50% annual savings for each individual medication strength. Previous literature suggests variable percentage of weight deviation in tablet-splitting studies; however, small deviations in weight may not be clinically relevant for antipsychotic agents based on their mechanism of action.
CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole and lurasidone are optimal agents for tablet splitting. Initiation of a tablet-splitting program has the potential to save up to 50% of drug costs for an inpatient hospital. Splitting of aripiprazole and lurasidone tablets may decrease drug cost and waste while ensuring patient accessibility to treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28579725      PMCID: PMC5440099     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P T        ISSN: 1052-1372


  20 in total

1.  Potential cost savings from pill splitting of newer psychotropic medications.

Authors:  C I Cohen; S I Cohen
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Weight variability of pharmacist-dispensed split tablets.

Authors:  Jack M Rosenberg; Joseph P Nathan; Fotios Plakogiannis
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

3.  The potential of pill splitting to achieve cost savings.

Authors:  Randall S Stafford; David C Radley
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Weight uniformity of split tablets required by a Veterans Affairs policy.

Authors:  James E Polli; Sharon Kim; Brian R Martin
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

5.  Treatments for bipolar disorder: can number needed to treat/harm help inform clinical decisions?

Authors:  T A Ketter; L Citrome; P W Wang; J L Culver; S Srivastava
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 6.  When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.

Authors:  L Citrome; T A Ketter
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Aripiprazole: profile on efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Paul J Goodnick; Jason M Jerry
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.889

8.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect.

Authors:  R J Cook; D L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

9.  Potential savings from splitting newer antidepressant medications.

Authors:  Carl I Cohen; Sara I Cohen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Tablet splitting of a narrow therapeutic index drug: a case with levothyroxine sodium.

Authors:  Rakhi B Shah; Jarrod S Collier; Vilayat A Sayeed; Arthur Bryant; Muhammad J Habib; Mansoor A Khan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.