| Literature DB >> 28579641 |
Jeffrey R Brown1, Arie Kapteyn2, Olivia S Mitchell3.
Abstract
This paper provides evidence that Social Security benefit claiming decisions are strongly affected by framing and are thus inconsistent with expected utility theory. Using a randomized experiment that controls for both observable and unobservable differences across individuals, we find that the use of a "breakeven analysis" encourages early claiming. Respondents are more likely to delay when later claiming is framed as a gain, and the claiming age is anchored at older ages. Additionally, the financially less literate, individuals with credit card debt, and those with lower earnings are more influenced by framing than others.Entities:
Keywords: American Life Panel; Annuities; Annuitization; Breakeven Analysis; Expected Utility Theory; Financial Literacy; Invariance; Retirement Income
Year: 2013 PMID: 28579641 PMCID: PMC5453649 DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2013.12004.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Risk Insur ISSN: 0022-4367