Blanca Escribano-Ferrer1, Francoise Cluzeau2, Derek Cutler2, Christiana Akufo3, Kalipso Chalkidou2. 1. Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England. 2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) International, London, England. 3. Institutional Care Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ghana has made major strides in improving access to health services. Despite these improvements, Ghana did not meet the Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. Quality of care is a major factor that could explain this shortfall. OBJECTIVE: To understand current practice and to identify needs in the area of quality of care in Ghana for improving health outcomes and to guide the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in supporting the care quality improvement efforts in Ghana. METHODS: The directory of existing standards, guidelines and protocols of the Ghana Health Service was reviewed and sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted to identify interventions that addressed quality of care. Additional information was obtained during a NICE scoping visit to Accra followed by a study tour of Ghanaian stakeholders to NICE and to the National Health Service. RESULTS: Since 1988, 489 policy interventions have been identified that address quality of care. Among them, the development of health protocols and guidelines were the most frequent interventions (n=150), followed by health policies and strategies (n=106); interventions related to health information (n=77); development of training manuals and staff training (n=69); development of regulations (n=38) and interventions related to organisation of services (n=15). CONCLUSIONS: Ghana has made significant efforts in developing guidelines, policies and conducting in-service training. Supervision, monitoring and evaluation have also received attention. However, less effort has been made in developing processes and systems and involving communities and service users. Some recommendations were made to guide the future work on quality of care. FUNDING: Rockefeller Foundation.
BACKGROUND: Ghana has made major strides in improving access to health services. Despite these improvements, Ghana did not meet the Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. Quality of care is a major factor that could explain this shortfall. OBJECTIVE: To understand current practice and to identify needs in the area of quality of care in Ghana for improving health outcomes and to guide the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in supporting the care quality improvement efforts in Ghana. METHODS: The directory of existing standards, guidelines and protocols of the Ghana Health Service was reviewed and sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted to identify interventions that addressed quality of care. Additional information was obtained during a NICE scoping visit to Accra followed by a study tour of Ghanaian stakeholders to NICE and to the National Health Service. RESULTS: Since 1988, 489 policy interventions have been identified that address quality of care. Among them, the development of health protocols and guidelines were the most frequent interventions (n=150), followed by health policies and strategies (n=106); interventions related to health information (n=77); development of training manuals and staff training (n=69); development of regulations (n=38) and interventions related to organisation of services (n=15). CONCLUSIONS: Ghana has made significant efforts in developing guidelines, policies and conducting in-service training. Supervision, monitoring and evaluation have also received attention. However, less effort has been made in developing processes and systems and involving communities and service users. Some recommendations were made to guide the future work on quality of care. FUNDING: Rockefeller Foundation.
Keywords:
Ghana; Technology Assessments/biomedical; guideline/clinical protocol; in-service training; policy; quality of health care; regulations; supervision
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Peter Tugwell; Andre Knottnerus Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Peter Lloyd-Sherlock; John Beard; Nadia Minicuci; Shah Ebrahim; Somnath Chatterji Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sarah Wood Pallas; Justice Nonvignon; Moses Aikins; Jennifer Prah Ruger Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 9.408