Literature DB >> 28579231

Optimized production and purification of Coxsackievirus B1 vaccine and its preclinical evaluation in a mouse model.

Minna M Hankaniemi1, Olli H Laitinen1, Virginia M Stone2, Amirbabak Sioofy-Khojine1, Juha A E Määttä1, Pär G Larsson3, Varpu Marjomäki4, Heikki Hyöty1, Malin Flodström-Tullberg2, Vesa P Hytönen5.   

Abstract

Coxsackie B viruses are among the most common enteroviruses, causing a wide range of diseases. Recent studies have also suggested that they may contribute to the development of type 1 diabetes. Vaccination would provide an effective way to prevent CVB infections, and the objective of this study was to develop an efficient vaccine production protocol for the generation of novel CVB vaccines. Various steps in the production of a formalin-inactivated Coxsackievirus B1 (CVB1) vaccine were optimized including the Multiplicity Of Infection (MOI) used for virus amplification, virus cultivation time, type of cell growth medium, virus purification method and formulation of the purified virus. Safety and immunogenicity of the formalin inactivated CVB1 vaccine was characterized in a mouse model. Two of the developed methods were found to be optimal for virus purification: the first employed PEG-precipitation followed by gelatin-chromatography and sucrose cushion pelleting (three-step protocol), yielding 19-fold increase in virus concentration (0.06µg/cm2) as compared to gold standard method. The second method utilized tandem sucrose pelleting without a PEG precipitation step, yielding 83-fold increase in virus concentration (0.24µg/cm2), but it was more labor-intensive and cannot be efficiently scaled up. Both protocols provide radically higher virus yields compared with traditional virus purification protocols involving PEG-precipitation and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. Formalin inactivation of CVB1 produced a vaccine that induced a strong, virus-neutralizing antibody response in vaccinated mice, which protected against challenge with CVB1 virus. Altogether, these results provide valuable information for the development of new enterovirus vaccines.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CVB1; Coxsackievirus B1; Formalin inactivation; Vaccine; Virus purification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28579231     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  12 in total

1.  Characterization of Coxsackievirus B4 virus-like particles VLP produced by the recombinant baculovirus-insect cell system expressing the major capsid protein.

Authors:  Ikbel Hadj Hassine; Jawhar Gharbi; Bechr Hamrita; Mohammed A Almalki; José Francisco Rodríguez; Manel Ben M'hadheb
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Enterovirus infection and type 1 diabetes: unraveling the crime scene.

Authors:  T Rodriguez-Calvo
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Cell-based influenza vaccine: current production, halal status assessment, and recommendations towards Islamic-compliant manufacturing.

Authors:  Nurul Nadiah Zulkarnain; Nurina Anuar; Norliza Abd Rahman; Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah; Muhammad Nazir Alias; Mashitoh Yaacob; Zhongren Ma; Gongtao Ding
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A novel rat CVB1-VP1 monoclonal antibody 3A6 detects a broad range of enteroviruses.

Authors:  Niila V V Saarinen; Jutta E Laiho; Sarah J Richardson; Marie Zeissler; Virginia M Stone; Varpu Marjomäki; Tino Kantoluoto; Marc S Horwitz; Amirbabak Sioofy-Khojine; Anni Honkimaa; Minna M Hankaniemi; Malin Flodström-Tullberg; Heikki Hyöty; Vesa P Hytönen; Olli H Laitinen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A hexavalent Coxsackievirus B vaccine is highly immunogenic and has a strong protective capacity in mice and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  V M Stone; M M Hankaniemi; O H Laitinen; A B Sioofy-Khojine; A Lin; I M Diaz Lozano; M A Mazur; V Marjomäki; K Loré; H Hyöty; V P Hytönen; M Flodström-Tullberg
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  Enteroviral infections in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes: new insights for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Sarah J Richardson; Noel G Morgan
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 7.  Genetic and Environmental Interaction in Type 1 Diabetes: a Relationship Between Genetic Risk Alleles and Molecular Traits of Enterovirus Infection?

Authors:  Marfa Blanter; Helena Sork; Soile Tuomela; Malin Flodström-Tullberg
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Antibody Responses against Enterovirus Proteases are Potential Markers for an Acute Infection.

Authors:  Niila V V Saarinen; Virginia M Stone; Minna M Hankaniemi; Magdalena A Mazur; Tytti Vuorinen; Malin Flodström-Tullberg; Heikki Hyöty; Vesa P Hytönen; Olli H Laitinen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Coxsackievirus B Vaccines Prevent Infection-Accelerated Diabetes in NOD Mice and Have No Disease-Inducing Effect.

Authors:  Virginia M Stone; Marta Butrym; Minna M Hankaniemi; Amir-Babak Sioofy-Khojine; Vesa P Hytönen; Heikki Hyöty; Malin Flodström-Tullberg
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  A Coxsackievirus B vaccine protects against virus-induced diabetes in an experimental mouse model of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Virginia M Stone; Minna M Hankaniemi; Emma Svedin; Amirbabak Sioofy-Khojine; Sami Oikarinen; Heikki Hyöty; Olli H Laitinen; Vesa P Hytönen; Malin Flodström-Tullberg
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.