Literature DB >> 28578782

Associations Between Anthropometric Measurements and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in White European and South Asian Adults in the United Kingdom.

Farah F Kidy1, Nafeesa Dhalwani2, Deirdre M Harrington3, Laura J Gray1, Danielle H Bodicoat2, David Webb2, Melanie J Davies2, Kamlesh Khunti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of 4 anthropometric measurements with cardiometabolic risk factors in a UK biethnic sample of South Asians (SAs) and white Europeans (WEs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Baseline data were collected from adults of WE and SA origin participating in the Leicester arm of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Leicester) study between August 2004 and December 2007. Overall, 6268 WE and SA adults had measures of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio assessed between June 18, 2004, and December 4, 2007. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and dysglycemia were established from venous blood samples using standard definitions. Crude and adjusted (covariates used were age, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and alcohol consumption) odds ratios were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve were used to calculate optimal cut points for the whole cohort and for both ethnic groups.
RESULTS: Increases in all anthropometric measurements resulted in a higher odds ratio for each of the risk factors in both the crude and adjusted models (P<.001). The adjusted odds ratios for dyslipidemia, hypertension, and dysglygemia ranged from 1.30 to 1.35, from 1.36 to 1.52, and from 1.62 to 1.75 (P<.001 for all), respectively, in WEs. The adjusted odds ratio for dyslipidemia, hypertension, and dysglygemia ranged from 1.50 to 1.65 (P<.01), from 1.40 to 1.60 (P<.01), and from 1.96 to 2.11 (P<.001 for all), respectively, in SAs. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for all the anthropometric measurements had low accuracy (P<.70) for the whole cohort and when stratified by ethnicity and sex.
CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to recommend replacing body mass index with another anthropometric measurement for the ethnically diverse population in the United Kingdom. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00318032.
Copyright © 2017 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28578782     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  6 in total

Review 1.  The use of Broca index to assess cut- off points for overweight in adults: A short review.

Authors:  Irakoze Laurent; Manirakiza Astère; Banderembako Paul; Nkengurutse Liliane; Yue Li; Qingfeng Cheng; Qifu Li; Xiaoqiu Xiao
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Optimum cutoff values of anthropometric indices of obesity for predicting hypertension: more than one decades of follow-up in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Azra Ramezankhani; Solmaz Ehteshami-Afshar; Mitra Hasheminia; Mohammad Ali Hajebrahimi; Fereidoun Azizi; Farzad Hadaegh
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nasheeta Peer; Yusentha Balakrishna; Solange Durao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Associations of anthropometric adiposity indexes with hypertension risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis including PURE-China.

Authors:  Guijuan Deng; Lu Yin; Weida Liu; Xiaoyun Liu; Quanyong Xiang; Zhenzhen Qian; Juntao Ma; Hui Chen; Yang Wang; Bo Hu; Wei Li; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Predictive Values of Anthropometric Measurements for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Diseases Among 44 048 Chinese.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Lap Ah Tse; Zhiguang Liu; Sumathy Rangarajan; Bo Hu; Lu Yin; Darryl P Leong; Wei Li
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Accuracy of obesity indices alone or in combination for prediction of diabetes: A novel risk score by linear combination of general and abdominal measures of obesity.

Authors:  Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki; Behzad Heidari
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2022
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.