Literature DB >> 28578468

Penetrating cardiac injuries: predictive model for outcomes based on 2016 patients from the National Trauma Data Bank.

J A Asensio1,2, O A Ogun3, P Petrone4, A J Perez-Alonso5, M Wagner3, R Bertellotti3, B Phillips3, D L Cornell3, A O Udekwu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries are uncommon and lethal. The objectives of this study are to examine the national profile of cardiac injuries, identify independent predictors of outcome, generate, compare and validate previous predictive models for outcomes. We hypothesized that National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) given its large number of patients, would validate these models.
METHODS: The NTDB was queried for data on cardiac injuries, using survival as the main outcome measure. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing univariate and stepwise logistic regression. The stepwise logistic regression model was then compared with other predictive models of outcome.
RESULTS: There were 2016 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries identified from 1,310,720 patients. Incidence: 0.16%. Mechanism of injury: GSWs-1264 (63%), SWs-716 (36%), Shotgun/impalement-19/16 (1%). Mean RTS 1.75, mean ISS 27 ± 23. Overall survival 675 (33%). 830 patients (41%) underwent ED thoracotomy, 47 survived (6%). Survival stratified by mechanism: GSWs 114/1264 (10%), SWs 564/717 (76%). Predictors of outcome for mortality-univariate analysis: vital signs, RTS, ISS, GCS: Field CPR, ED intubation, ED thoracotomy and aortic cross-clamping (p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression identified cardiac GSW's (p < 0.001; AOR 26.85; 95% CI 17.21-41.89), field CPR (p = 0.003; AOR 3.65; 95% CI 1.53-8.69), the absence of spontaneous ventilation (p = 0.008; AOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14), the presence of an associated abdominal GSW (p = 0.009; AOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.26-5.26) need for ED airway (p = 0.0003 AOR 1386.30; 95% CI 126.0-15251.71) and aortic cross-clamping (p = 0.0003 AOR 0.18; 95% CI 0.11-0.28) as independent predictors for mortality. Overall predictive power of model-93%.
CONCLUSION: Predictors of outcome were identified. Overall survival rates are lower than prospective studies report. Predictive model from NTDB generated larger number of strong independent predictors of outcomes, correlated and validated previous predictive models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac injuries; NTDB; Penetrating cardiac injuries; Predictors of outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28578468     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0806-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  40 in total

1.  Penetrating cardiac wounds: A comparison of different therapeutic methods.

Authors:  P N Symbas; N Harlaftis; W J Waldo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Penetrating chest trauma: should indications for emergency room thoracotomy be limited?

Authors:  S E Brown; G A Gomez; L E Jacobson; T Scherer; R A McMillan
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Penetrating wounds of the heart: changing patterns of surgical management.

Authors:  A C Beall; T A Patrick; J E Okies; D L Bricker; M E DeBakey
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1972-06

4.  Penetrating wounds of the heart. An analysis of 459 cases.

Authors:  W L Sugg; W J Rea; R R Ecker; W R Webb; E F Rose; R R Shaw
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Principles for the management of penetrating cardiac wounds.

Authors:  J Evans; L A Gray; A Rayner; R L Fulton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Aggressive management of potential penetrating cardiac injuries.

Authors:  V A DeGennaro; E A Bonfils-Roberts; N Ching; T F Nealon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Surgical approach of choice for penetrating cardiac wounds.

Authors:  M E Mitchell; F F Muakkassa; G V Poole; R S Rhodes; J A Griswold
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-01

Review 8.  Penetrating cardiac injuries.

Authors:  J A Asensio; B M Stewart; J Murray; A H Fox; A Falabella; H Gomez; A Ortega; C B Fuller; M D Kerstein
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Predictors of outcome in penetrating cardiac injuries.

Authors:  Askiin Ender Topal; Yusuf Celik; Mehmet Nesimi Eren
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-09

Review 10.  Penetrating cardiac injuries: clinical classification and management strategy.

Authors:  R Saadia; R D Levy; E Degiannis; G C Velmahos
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Penetrating trauma and invasive management of thorax trauma.

Authors:  L P H Leenen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.693

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.