Literature DB >> 28578138

Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units.

Leah Taylor1, Emily Miller1, Kenton R Kaufman2.   

Abstract

Optical motion capture systems are used to assess human motion. While these systems provide a reliable analysis, they limit collection to a laboratory based setting. Devices such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been developed as alternative tools. Commercially available IMUs are utilized for a variety of applications; however limited work has been done to determine the reliability of these devices. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a commercially available IMU, containing tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, under controlled static and dynamic conditions. The sensor output was validated against the gold standard measures of custom made mechanical testing apparatuses. The IMUs provide an accurate (within 0.6°) and precise (within 0.1°) measurement of static sensor orientation and an accurate (within 4.4° per second) and precise (within 0.2° per second) representation of angular velocity. The sensors are more accurate at lower velocities, but the percent error remains relatively constant across all angular velocities. Inclusion of IMUs as an appropriate measurement tool should be based on the application, specific demands and necessary reliability.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angular velocity; Inertial measurement units; Orientation; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28578138     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  5 in total

1.  Free-living gait does not differentiate chronic mTBI patients compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Dylan Powell; Alan Godfrey; Lucy Parrington; Kody R Campbell; Laurie A King; Sam Stuart
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.208

2.  Reliability Study of Inertial Sensors LIS2DH12 Compared to ActiGraph GT9X: Based on Free Code.

Authors:  Jaime Martín-Martín; Ariadna Jiménez-Partinen; Irene De-Torres; Adrian Escriche-Escuder; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Muro-Culebras; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Fermín Mayoral-Cleries; Attila Biró; Wen Tang; Borjanka Nikolova; Alfredo Salvatore; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Accuracy and Repeatability of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Measured with an Inertial Measurement Unit.

Authors:  Jorge Posada-Ordax; Julia Cosin-Matamoros; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo; Laura Esteban-Gonzalo; Carlos Martin-Villa; César Calvo-Lobo; David Rodriguez-Sanz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  In-Field Validation of an Inertial Sensor-Based System for Movement Analysis and Classification in Ski Mountaineering.

Authors:  Jules Gellaerts; Evgeny Bogdanov; Farzin Dadashi; Benoit Mariani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Validation of a Device to Measure Knee Joint Angles for a Dynamic Movement.

Authors:  Mirel Ajdaroski; Ruchika Tadakala; Lorraine Nichols; Amanda Esquivel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.