Literature DB >> 28577906

Dynamic head-neck stabilization and modulation with perturbation bandwidth investigated using a multisegment neuromuscular model.

Riender Happee1, Edo de Bruijn2, Patrick A Forbes3, Frans C T van der Helm4.   

Abstract

The human head-neck system requires continuous stabilization in the presence of gravity and trunk motion. We investigated contributions of the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR), the cervicocollic reflex (CCR), and neck muscle co-contraction to head-in-space and head-on-trunk stabilization, and investigated modulation of the stabilization strategy with the frequency content of trunk perturbations and the presence of visual feedback. We developed a multisegment cervical spine model where reflex gains (VCR and CCR) and neck muscle co-contraction were estimated by fitting the model to the response of young healthy subjects, seated and exposed to anterior-posterior trunk motion, with frequency content from 0.3 up to 1, 2, 4 and 8Hz, with and without visual feedback. The VCR contributed to head-in-space stabilization with a strong reduction of head rotation (<8Hz) and a moderate reduction of head translation (>1Hz). The CCR contributed to head-on-trunk stabilization with a reduction of head rotation and head translation relative to the trunk (<2Hz). The CCR also proved essential to stabilize the individual intervertebral joints and prevent neck buckling. Co-contraction was estimated to be of minor relevance. Control strategies employed during low bandwidth perturbations most effectively reduced head rotation and head relative displacement up to 3Hz while control strategies employed during high bandwidth perturbations reduced head global translation between 1 and 4Hz. This indicates a shift from minimizing head-on-trunk rotation and translation during low bandwidth perturbations to minimizing head-in-space translation during high bandwidth perturbations. Presence of visual feedback had limited effects suggesting increased usage of vestibular feedback.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCR; Co-contraction; Feedback; Musculoskeletal model; Neck; Postural control; VCR; Vestibular

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28577906     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal modelling of the human cervical spine for the investigation of injury mechanisms during axial impacts.

Authors:  Pavlos Silvestros; Ezio Preatoni; Harinderjit S Gill; Sabina Gheduzzi; Bruno Agostinho Hernandez; Timothy P Holsgrove; Dario Cazzola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Frequency-dependent deficits in head steadiness in patients with nonspecific neck pain.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Stensdotter; Ingebrigt Meisingset; Morten Dinhoff Pedersen; Ottar Vasseljen; Øyvind Stavdahl
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-03

3.  Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality.

Authors:  Ksander N De Winkel; Ellen Edel; Riender Happee; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Multimodal control of neck muscles for vestibular mediated head oscillation damping during walking: a pilot study.

Authors:  Matthias Hölzl; Winfried Neuhuber; Olaf Ueberschär; Axel Schleichardt; Natalie Stamm; Christoph Arens; Andreas Biesdorf; Ulrich Goessler; Roland Hülse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.