Literature DB >> 28577752

Usefulness of a Gentle and Short Hemostasis Using the Transradial Band Device after Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Interventions to Reduce the Radial Artery Occlusion Rate (from the Prospective and Randomized CRASOC I, II, and III Studies).

Vincent Dangoisse1, Antoine Guédès2, Patrick Chenu3, Claude Hanet2, Clara Albert2, Valérie Robin2, Laurence Tavier2, Christine Dury2, Olivier Piraux2, Juliette Domange2, Karine Jourdan2, Benoit Bihin4, Erwin Schroeder2.   

Abstract

The study sought to evaluate the benefit of the reduction in intensity and duration of the hemostasis obtained with the transradial (TR) Band compression device on the radial artery occlusion (RAO) rate. RAO is the most frequent complication of TR access for cardiac catheterization and limits future use of this safe route. Its occurrence must be minimized. Between 2009 and 2016, 3,616 TR accesses were randomized to TR Band hemostasis during 3 consecutive protocols: CRASOC I (Compression of Radial ArterieS without Occlusion): 13 versus 10 cc of air into the TR Band and for 4 hours of continuous compression; CRASOC II: 10 cc of air for 3 hours versus 2 hours of compression; and CRASOC III: 10 cc of air for 2 hours versus 1.5 hours of compression and virtual 4F introducer as default sheath (both arms). Radial artery patency was assessed by plethysmography at 24 hours, using Doppler for doubtful or negative plethysmography. The primary end point, 24 hours of RAO, was markedly reduced when hemostasis was soft (10 cc of air) and short (1.5 hours) and resulted in a 2.3% rate of RAO versus 9.4% for 13 cc, 4 hours. Hemostasis was obtained in 89% of patients with only 10 cc of air and in 97% of patients with less than the recommended 13 cc. About 8% of patients required more than the 1.5 hours of hemostasis time. In conclusion, short and soft hemostasis with the TR Band device leads to a low RAO rate.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28577752     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Factors influencing radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention in the Indian population.

Authors:  Suddhanshu Kumar Dwivedi; Akhil Kumar Sharma; Gyan Ranjan Nayak; Gaurav Kumar Chaudhary; Sharad Chandra; Akshyaya Pradhan; Pravesh Vishwakarma; Monika Bhandari; Rishi Sethi
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Randomized clinical study on radial artery compression time after elective coronary angiography.

Authors:  Maria Aparecida de Carvalho Campos; Claudia Maria Rodrigues Alves; Miriam Harumi Tsunemi; Maria Angélica Sorgini Peterlini; Ariane Ferreira Machado Avelar
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-11-29

3.  Performing diagnostic radial access coronary angiography on uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulant therapy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-06-20

4.  Incidence, functional impact and predictive factors for the presentation of complications associated with radial access for coronary angiography evaluated through ultrasonography, hospital cohort

Authors:  Karen A García-Rueda; César H Cediel-Barrera; Maribel Plaza-Tenorio; John U Cataño-Bedoya; Juan C Ortiz-Uribe; Keyner Toro-Osorio; Mailyn Peña-Pineda; Juan M Senior-Sánchez
Journal:  Arch Cardiol Mex       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Different Antiplatelet Strategies for Radial Artery Protection After Transradial Coronary Angiography-A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zheng Qin; Xingsheng Yang; Wanjun Cheng; Jianlong Wang; Zening Jin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-14

6.  Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Adel Aminian; Shigeru Saito; Akihiko Takahashi; Ivo Bernat; Robert Lee Jobe; Takashi Kajiya; Ian C Gilchrist; Yves Louvard; Ferdinand Kiemeneij; Niels van Royen; Maarten van Leeuwen; Seiji Yamazaki; Takashi Matsukage; Juan F Iglesias; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Hand Laser Perfusion Imaging to Assess Radial Artery Patency: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Francesco Passafaro; Sabato Sorrentino; Carmen Spaccarotella; Annalisa Mongiardo; Daniele Torella; Alberto Polimeni; Jolanda Sabatino; Antonio Curcio; Salvatore De Rosa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion-The RESCUE-RAO Trial.

Authors:  Dmitrii V Ognerubov; Alexander Sedaghat; Sergey I Provatorov; Andrey S Tereshchenko; Olivier F Bertrand; Ivo Bernat; Goar K Arutyunyan; Olga A Pogorelova; Maria I Tripoten; Tatyana V Balakhonova; Anatoliy N Samko; Evgeny V Merkulov
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.