Literature DB >> 28576375

Testing commercial biopreservative against spoilage microorganisms in MAP packed Ricotta fresca cheese.

C Spanu1, C Scarano2, F Piras2, V Spanu2, C Pala2, D Casti2, S Lamon2, F Cossu2, M Ibba2, G Nieddu3, E P L De Santis2.   

Abstract

Ricotta fresca cheese is susceptible to secondary contamination and is able to support the growth of pathogens or spoilage psychotrophic bacteria during storage. The aim of the present study was to evaluate which among three commercial biopreservatives was suitable to be used to control the growth of spoilage microorganisms in sheep's milk MAP ricotta fresca cheese. 144 Ricotta fresca cheese samples were inoculated either with the bioprotective culture Lyofast FPR 2 (including Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus plantarum e Lactobacillus rhamnosus) or Lyofast CNBAL (Carnobacterium spp) or the fermentate MicroGARD 430. Not inoculated control and experimental ricotta were MAP packed (30% CO2 and 70% N2) and stored at 4 °C. Triplicate samples were analyzed after 5 h and 7, 14 and 21 days after inoculation for total bacterial count, mesophilic lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp, Listeria monocytogenes, moulds and yeasts. Among the tested biopreservatives only Carnobacterium spp was able to control Pseudomonas spp and Enterobacteriaceae. The maximum reduction in the concentration of Pseudomonas spp and Enterobacteriaceae was respectively 1.93 and 2.66 log10 cfu/g, observed 14 days after production. Therefore, Carnobacterium spp was selected as the culture of choice to conduct a challenge study against Pseudomonas spp.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carnobacterium spp.; MAP; Protective cultures; Pseudomonas spp; Ricotta

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28576375     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  6 in total

1.  Dietary Fibers and Protective Lactobacilli Drive Burrata Cheese Microbiome.

Authors:  Fabio Minervini; Amalia Conte; Matteo Alessandro Del Nobile; Marco Gobbetti; Maria De Angelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of quality parameters and shelf life of fresh cheese packed under modified atmosphere.

Authors:  Irena Barukčić; Mario Ščetar; Iva Marasović; Katarina Lisak Jakopović; Kata Galić; Rajka Božanić
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Retrospective study on the hygienic quality of fresh ricotta cheeses produced in Sicily, Italy.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Scatassa; Isabella Mancuso; Sonia Sciortino; Giusi Macaluso; Marisa Palmeri; Luigi Arcuri; Massimo Todaro; Cinzia Cardamone
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2018-04-09

4.  Microbiomes Associated With Foods From Plant and Animal Sources.

Authors:  Karen G Jarvis; Ninalynn Daquigan; James R White; Paul M Morin; Laura M Howard; Julia E Manetas; Andrea Ottesen; Padmini Ramachandran; Christopher J Grim
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Growth and Biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes in Greek Anthotyros Whey Cheese without or with a Crude Enterocin A-B-P Extract: Interactive Effects of the Native Spoilage Microbiota during Vacuum-Packed Storage at 4 °C.

Authors:  Nikoletta Sameli; John Samelis
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  Assessment of the Spoilage Microbiota during Refrigerated (4 °C) Vacuum-Packed Storage of Fresh Greek Anthotyros Whey Cheese without or with a Crude Enterocin A-B-P-Containing Extract.

Authors:  Nikoletta Sameli; Eleni Sioziou; Loulouda Bosnea; Athanasia Kakouri; John Samelis
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.