Literature DB >> 28576210

Accuracy of referral diagnosis to an emergency eye clinic.

Jasmin Nari1, Larry H Allen2, Lulu L C D Bursztyn3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of diagnosis of ophthalmic problems from health care practitioners such as optometrists, general practitioners, and emergency physicians in and around London, Ontario, Canada.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of all referrals to the Ivey Eye Institute emergency eye clinic over a period of 6 months from January to July 2011. PARTICIPANTS: During the study period, there were 1810 patient encounters, including 1134 new referrals.
METHODS: For each patient encounter, information was collected regarding basic demographics, referral source, referral diagnosis, and final diagnosis. Referrals were categorized by source of referral and anatomic location of the eye problem. The accuracy of each referral was assessed by comparing the referral diagnosis to the final diagnosis. Referrals were categorized as correct, incorrect, not yet diagnosed, nonspecific, or baseline examination.
RESULTS: Referral diagnoses were correct in 45% and incorrect in 28% overall. Referral diagnoses from optometrists were correct in 54%, from emergency physicians were 39% correct, and from general practitioners were 33% correct. Ophthalmologists had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with 83% of referral diagnoses being correct. Diagnoses were incorrect in 36% from optometrists, 28% from emergency physicians, and 32% from general practitioners.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the low accuracy rate of referral diagnoses of emergency eye patients from nonophthalmologists to the Ivey Eye Institute emergency eye clinic. Better training in the diagnosis of ophthalmic problems for general practitioner and emergency medicine residents would be of benefit. Optometrists may also find it helpful to have improved emergency and urgency training. Ophthalmologists should be involved in this training.
Copyright © 2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28576210     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  7 in total

1.  Glaucoma Community Care: Does Ongoing Shared Care Work?

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Elizabeth Wong; Jessie Huang; Michael Yapp; Katherine Masselos; Michael Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.120

2.  Ophthalmology on Call: Evaluating the Volume, Urgency, and Type of Pages Received at a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Heather M McDonald; Yiannis Iordanous
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Bayesian Decision-Making Algorithm for Vision Loss.

Authors:  Amy Basilious; Chris N Govas; Alexander M Deans; Pradeepa Yoganathan; Robin M Deans
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Training in and comfort with diagnosis and management of ophthalmic emergencies among emergency medicine physicians in the United States.

Authors:  Joshua H Uhr; Nicholas J Governatori; Qiang Ed Zhang; Rose Hamershock; Jake E Radell; Jun Yeop Lee; Jasmine Tatum; Albert Y Wu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists.

Authors:  Vincent Khou; Angelica Ly; Lindsay Moore; Maria Markoulli; Michael Kalloniatis; Michael Yapp; Michael Hennessy; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Undergraduate Ophthalmology Teaching in Saudi Arabia: Assessment, Analysis, and Comparisons.

Authors:  Ruba M Alselaimy; Hani B ALBalawi
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-12-14

7.  The burden of flashes and floaters in traditional general emergency services and utilization of ophthalmology on-call consultation: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carl Shen; Alicia Liu; Forough Farrokhyar; Mark Fava
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.086

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.