Literature DB >> 28575482

A comparison of pine and spruce in recovery from winter stress; changes in recovery kinetics, and the abundance and phosphorylation status of photosynthetic proteins during winter.

Ryan Merry1,2, Jacob Jerrard1, Julia Frebault1, Amy Verhoeven1.   

Abstract

During winter evergreens maintain a sustained form of thermal energy dissipation that results in reduced photochemical efficiency measured using the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm. Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] have been shown to differ in their rate of recovery of Fv/Fm from winter stress. The goal of this study was to monitor changes in photosynthetic protein abundance and phosphorylation status during winter recovery that accompany these functional changes. An additional goal was to determine whether light-dependent changes in light harvesting complex II (LHCII) phosphorylation occur during winter conditions. We used a combination of field measurements and recovery experiments to monitor chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic protein content and phosphorylation status. We found that pine recovered three times more slowly than spruce, and that the kinetics of recovery in spruce included a rapid and slow component, while in pine there was only a rapid component to recovery. Both species retained relatively high amounts of the light harvesting protein Lhcb5 (CP26) and the PsbS protein during winter, suggesting a role for these proteins in sustained thermal dissipation. Both species maintained high phosphorylation of LHCII and the D1 protein in darkness during winter. Pine and spruce differed in the kinetics of the dephosphorylation of LHCII and D1 upon warming, suggesting the rate of dephosphorylation of LHCII and D1 may be important in the rapid component of recovery from winter stress. Finally, we demonstrated that light-dependent changes in LHII phosphorylation do not continue to occur on subzero winter days and that needles are maintained in a phosphorylation pattern consistent with the high light conditions to which those needles are exposed. Our results suggest a role for retained phosphorylation of both LHCII and D1 in maintenance of the photosynthetic machinery in a winter conformation that maximizes thermal energy dissipation.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CP26; PsbS; conifer; low temperature stress; sustained energy dissipation; thylakoid protein phosphorylation; winter stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28575482     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpx065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  3 in total

1.  Phosphoproteomics of cold stress-responsive mechanisms in Rhododendron chrysanthum.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Hang Fan; Jiawei Dong; Jianyu Chen; Hongwei Xu; Xiaofu Zhou
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  The unique photosynthetic apparatus of Pinaceae: analysis of photosynthetic complexes in Picea abies.

Authors:  Steffen Grebe; Andrea Trotta; Azfar A Bajwa; Marjaana Suorsa; Peter J Gollan; Stefan Jansson; Mikko Tikkanen; Eva-Mari Aro
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Direct energy transfer from photosystem II to photosystem I confers winter sustainability in Scots Pine.

Authors:  Pushan Bag; Volha Chukhutsina; Zishan Zhang; Suman Paul; Alexander G Ivanov; Tatyana Shutova; Roberta Croce; Alfred R Holzwarth; Stefan Jansson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.