Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez1, María Ángeles Vaz1, Carmen Balañá1, Miguel Gil-Gil1, Gaspar Reynés1, Óscar Gallego1, María Martínez-García1, Elena Vicente1, María Quindós1, Raquel Luque1, Ana Ramos1, Yolanda Ruano1, Pedro Pérez-Segura1, Manuel Benavides1, Pilar Sánchez-Gómez1, Aurelio Hernández-Laín1. 1. Neuro-oncology Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain; Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain; Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Granada, Granada, Spain; Neuro-radiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Molecular Pathology Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico de San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain; Neuro-oncology Unit, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Neuro-pathology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a multicenter, 2-stage, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GB) and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) amplification with or without variant III (EGFRvIII) deletion. METHODS: Patients with first recurrence were enrolled in 2 cohorts. Cohort A included patients with EGFR gene amplification without EGFRvIII mutation. Cohort B included patients with EGFR gene amplification and EGFRvIII mutation. Dacomitinib was administered (45 mg/day) until disease progression/unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RANO criteria) at 6 months (PFS6). RESULTS: Thirty patients in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 39-81), 65.3% were male, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0/1/2 were 10.2%/65.3%/24.5%, respectively. PFS6 was 10.6% (Cohort A: 13.3%; Cohort B: 5.9%) with a median PFS of 2.7 months (Cohort A: 2.7 mo; Cohort B: 2.6 mo). Four patients were progression free at 6 months and 3 patients were so at 12 months. Median overall survival was 7.4 months (Cohort A: 7.8 mo; Cohort B: 6.7 mo). The best overall response included 1 complete response and 2 partial responses (4.1%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (24.5%: eight in Cohort A and four in Cohort B). Diarrhea and rash were the most common AEs; 20 (40.8%) patients experienced grade 3-4 drug-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Dacomitinib has a limited single-agent activity in recurrent GB with EGFR amplification. The detailed molecular characterization of the 4 patients with response in this trial can be useful to select patients who could benefit from dacomitinib.
BACKGROUND: We conducted a multicenter, 2-stage, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GB) and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) amplification with or without variant III (EGFRvIII) deletion. METHODS: Patients with first recurrence were enrolled in 2 cohorts. Cohort A included patients with EGFR gene amplification without EGFRvIII mutation. Cohort B included patients with EGFR gene amplification and EGFRvIII mutation. Dacomitinib was administered (45 mg/day) until disease progression/unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RANO criteria) at 6 months (PFS6). RESULTS: Thirty patients in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 39-81), 65.3% were male, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0/1/2 were 10.2%/65.3%/24.5%, respectively. PFS6 was 10.6% (Cohort A: 13.3%; Cohort B: 5.9%) with a median PFS of 2.7 months (Cohort A: 2.7 mo; Cohort B: 2.6 mo). Four patients were progression free at 6 months and 3 patients were so at 12 months. Median overall survival was 7.4 months (Cohort A: 7.8 mo; Cohort B: 6.7 mo). The best overall response included 1 complete response and 2 partial responses (4.1%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (24.5%: eight in Cohort A and four in Cohort B). Diarrhea and rash were the most common AEs; 20 (40.8%) patients experienced grade 3-4 drug-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Dacomitinib has a limited single-agent activity in recurrent GB with EGFR amplification. The detailed molecular characterization of the 4 patients with response in this trial can be useful to select patients who could benefit from dacomitinib.
Authors: Deepti B Ramnarain; Seongmi Park; Diana Y Lee; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Shane O Scoggin; Hasan Otu; Towia A Libermann; Jack M Raisanen; Raheela Ashfaq; Eric T Wong; Julian Wu; Robert Elliott; Amyn A Habib Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Martin J van den Bent; Ya Gao; Melissa Kerkhof; Johan M Kros; Thierry Gorlia; Kitty van Zwieten; Jory Prince; Sjoerd van Duinen; Peter A Sillevis Smitt; Martin Taphoorn; Pim J French Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Suresh S Ramalingam; Fiona Blackhall; Maciej Krzakowski; Carlos H Barrios; Keunchil Park; Isabel Bover; Dae Seog Heo; Rafael Rosell; Denis C Talbot; Richard Frank; Stephen P Letrent; Ana Ruiz-Garcia; Ian Taylor; Jane Q Liang; Alicyn K Campbell; Joseph O'Connell; Michael Boyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicholas J Szerlip; Alicia Pedraza; Debyani Chakravarty; Mohammad Azim; Jeremy McGuire; Yuqiang Fang; Tatsuya Ozawa; Eric C Holland; Jason T Huse; Suresh Jhanwar; Margaret A Leversha; Tom Mikkelsen; Cameron W Brennan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin J van den Bent; Alba A Brandes; Roy Rampling; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Johan M Kros; Antoine F Carpentier; Paul M Clement; Marc Frenay; Mario Campone; Jean-Francois Baurain; Jean-Paul Armand; Martin J B Taphoorn; Alicia Tosoni; Heidemarie Kletzl; Barbara Klughammer; Denis Lacombe; Thierry Gorlia Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Andrew B Lassman; Paul S Mischel; Neal Rosen; Howard I Scher; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; David Shaffer; Eric Lis; Lauren E Abrey Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Koji Yoshimoto; Julie Dang; Shaojun Zhu; David Nathanson; Tiffany Huang; Rebecca Dumont; David B Seligson; William H Yong; Zhenggang Xiong; Nagesh Rao; Henrik Winther; Arnab Chakravarti; Darell D Bigner; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Steve Horvath; Webster K Cavenee; Timothy F Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Anita Lal; Chad A Glazer; Holly M Martinson; Henry S Friedman; Gary E Archer; John H Sampson; Gregory J Riggins Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Krishna M Talasila; Anke Soentgerath; Philipp Euskirchen; Gro V Rosland; Jian Wang; Peter C Huszthy; Lars Prestegarden; Kai Ove Skaftnesmo; Per Øystein Sakariassen; Eskil Eskilsson; Daniel Stieber; Olivier Keunen; Narve Brekka; Ingrid Moen; Janice M Nigro; Olav K Vintermyr; Morten Lund-Johansen; Simone Niclou; Sverre J Mørk; Per Oyvind Enger; Rolf Bjerkvig; Hrvoje Miletic Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Eskil Eskilsson; Gro V Røsland; Gergely Solecki; Qianghu Wang; Patrick N Harter; Grazia Graziani; Roel G W Verhaak; Frank Winkler; Rolf Bjerkvig; Hrvoje Miletic Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jonathan E Tsang; Lorenz M Urner; Gyudong Kim; Kingsley Chow; Lynn Baufeld; Kym Faull; Timothy F Cloughesy; Peter M Clark; Michael E Jung; David A Nathanson Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Kelly V Pinheiro; Amanda Thomaz; Bárbara Kunzler Souza; Victoria Anne Metcalfe; Natália Hogetop Freire; André Tesainer Brunetto; Caroline Brunetto de Farias; Mariane Jaeger; Victorio Bambini; Christopher G S Smith; Lisa Shaw; Rafael Roesler Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2020-08-29 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Andrew S Chi; Daniel P Cahill; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David M Peereboom; Eric T Wong; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Jorg Dietrich; Scott R Plotkin; Andrew D Norden; Eudocia Q Lee; Lakshmi Nayak; Shota Tanaka; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Nina Lelic; Mara V Koerner; Lindsay K Klofas; Mia S Bertalan; Isabel C Arrillaga-Romany; Rebecca A Betensky; William T Curry; Darrel R Borger; Leonora Balaj; Robert R Kitchen; Sudipto K Chakrabortty; Michael D Valentino; Johan Skog; Xandra O Breakefield; A John Iafrate; Tracy T Batchelor Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-06-08