PURPOSE: Establishing reliable methods for interpreting elevated cerebral amyloid-β plaque on PET scans is increasingly important for radiologists, as availability of PET imaging in clinical practice increases. We examined a 3-step method to detect plaque in cognitively normal older adults, focusing on the additive value of quantitative information during the PET scan interpretation process. METHODS: Fifty-five F-florbetapir PET scans were evaluated by 3 experienced raters. Scans were first visually interpreted as having "elevated" or "nonelevated" plaque burden ("Visual Read"). Images were then processed using a standardized quantitative analysis software (MIMneuro) to generate whole brain and region of interest SUV ratios. This "Quantitative Read" was considered elevated if at least 2 of 6 regions of interest had an SUV ratio of more than 1.1. The final interpretation combined both visual and quantitative data together ("VisQ Read"). Cohen kappa values were assessed as a measure of interpretation agreement. RESULTS: Plaque was elevated in 25.5% to 29.1% of the 165 total Visual Reads. Interrater agreement was strong (kappa = 0.73-0.82) and consistent with reported values. Quantitative Reads were elevated in 45.5% of participants. Final VisQ Reads changed from initial Visual Reads in 16 interpretations (9.7%), with most changing from "nonelevated" Visual Reads to "elevated." These changed interpretations demonstrated lower plaque quantification than those initially read as "elevated" that remained unchanged. Interrater variability improved for VisQ Reads with the addition of quantitative information (kappa = 0.88-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of quantitative information increases consistency of PET scan interpretations for early detection of cerebral amyloid-β plaque accumulation.
PURPOSE: Establishing reliable methods for interpreting elevated cerebral amyloid-β plaque on PET scans is increasingly important for radiologists, as availability of PET imaging in clinical practice increases. We examined a 3-step method to detect plaque in cognitively normal older adults, focusing on the additive value of quantitative information during the PET scan interpretation process. METHODS: Fifty-five F-florbetapir PET scans were evaluated by 3 experienced raters. Scans were first visually interpreted as having "elevated" or "nonelevated" plaque burden ("Visual Read"). Images were then processed using a standardized quantitative analysis software (MIMneuro) to generate whole brain and region of interest SUV ratios. This "Quantitative Read" was considered elevated if at least 2 of 6 regions of interest had an SUV ratio of more than 1.1. The final interpretation combined both visual and quantitative data together ("VisQ Read"). Cohen kappa values were assessed as a measure of interpretation agreement. RESULTS: Plaque was elevated in 25.5% to 29.1% of the 165 total Visual Reads. Interrater agreement was strong (kappa = 0.73-0.82) and consistent with reported values. Quantitative Reads were elevated in 45.5% of participants. Final VisQ Reads changed from initial Visual Reads in 16 interpretations (9.7%), with most changing from "nonelevated" Visual Reads to "elevated." These changed interpretations demonstrated lower plaque quantification than those initially read as "elevated" that remained unchanged. Interrater variability improved for VisQ Reads with the addition of quantitative information (kappa = 0.88-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of quantitative information increases consistency of PET scan interpretations for early detection of cerebral amyloid-β plaque accumulation.
Authors: Guy M McKhann; David S Knopman; Howard Chertkow; Bradley T Hyman; Clifford R Jack; Claudia H Kawas; William E Klunk; Walter J Koroshetz; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Richard C Mohs; John C Morris; Martin N Rossor; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Sandra Weintraub; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: P Payoux; J Delrieu; A Gallini; D Adel; A S Salabert; A Hitzel; C Cantet; M Tafani; D De Verbizier; J Darcourt; Ph Fernandez; J Monteil; I Carrié; T Voisin; S Gillette-Guyonnet; M Pontecorvo; B Vellas; S Andrieu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: T Yamane; Y Ikari; T Nishio; K Ishii; K Ishii; T Kato; K Ito; D H S Silverman; M Senda; T Asada; H Arai; M Sugishita; T Iwatsubo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Abhinay D Joshi; Michael J Pontecorvo; Chrisopher M Clark; Alan P Carpenter; Danna L Jennings; Carl H Sadowsky; Lee P Adler; Karel D Kovnat; John P Seibyl; Anupa Arora; Krishnendu Saha; Jason D Burns; Mark J Lowrey; Mark A Mintun; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: A P Nayate; J G Dubroff; J E Schmitt; I Nasrallah; R Kishore; D Mankoff; D A Pryma Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Christopher M Clark; Michael J Pontecorvo; Thomas G Beach; Barry J Bedell; R Edward Coleman; P Murali Doraiswamy; Adam S Fleisher; Eric M Reiman; Marwan N Sabbagh; Carl H Sadowsky; Julie A Schneider; Anupa Arora; Alan P Carpenter; Matthew L Flitter; Abhinay D Joshi; Michael J Krautkramer; Ming Lu; Mark A Mintun; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Gaël Chételat; Renaud La Joie; Nicolas Villain; Audrey Perrotin; Vincent de La Sayette; Francis Eustache; Rik Vandenberghe Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Jeremy N Ford; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Myrto Skafida; Shannon Glynn; Michael Amoashiy; Dale J Lange; Eaton Lin; Gloria C Chiang; Joseph R Osborne; Silky Pahlajani; Mony J de Leon; Jana Ivanidze Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-08-15
Authors: Natasha M Smith; Jeremy N Ford; Arsalan Haghdel; Lidia Glodzik; Yi Li; Debra D'Angelo; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Xiuyuan Wang; Kaj Blennow; Mony J de Leon; Jana Ivanidze Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 5.702
Authors: Matthew K Taylor; Debra K Sullivan; Russell H Swerdlow; Eric D Vidoni; Jill K Morris; Jonathan D Mahnken; Jeffrey M Burns Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ida Sonni; Orit H Lesman Segev; Suzanne L Baker; Leonardo Iaccarino; Deniz Korman; Gil D Rabinovici; William J Jagust; Susan M Landau; Renaud La Joie Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-11-28
Authors: Antoine Leuzy; Johan Lilja; Christopher J Buckley; Rik Ossenkoppele; Sebastian Palmqvist; Mark Battle; Gill Farrar; Dietmar R Thal; Shorena Janelidze; Erik Stomrud; Olof Strandberg; Ruben Smith; Oskar Hansson Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 9.910