Literature DB >> 28574627

CT versus MR Techniques in the Detection of Cervical Artery Dissection.

Uta Hanning1,2, Peter B Sporns2, Meilin Schmiedel3, Erich B Ringelstein3, Walter Heindel2, Heinz Wiendl3, Thomas Niederstadt2, Ralf Dittrich3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) is an important etiology of juvenile stroke. The gold standard for the diagnosis of sCAD is convential angiography. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/MR angiography (MRA) and computed tomography (CT)/CT angiography (CTA) are frequently used alternatives. New developments such as multislice CT/CTA have enabled routine acquisition of thinner sections with rapid imaging times. The goal of this study was to compare the capability of recent developed 128-slice CT/CTA to MRI/MRA to detect radiologic features of sCAD.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with suspected sCAD (n = 188) in a database of our Stroke center (2008-2014), who underwent CT/CTA and MRI/MRA on initial clinical work-up. A control group of 26 patients was added. All Images were evaluated concerning specific and sensitive radiological features for dissection by two experienced neuroradiologists. Imaging features were compared between the two modalities.
RESULTS: Forty patients with 43 dissected arteries received both modalities (29 internal carotid arteries [ICAs] and 14 vertebral arteries [VAs]). All CADs were identified in CT/CTA and MRI/MRA. The features intimal flap, stenosis, and lumen irregularity appeared in both modalities. One high-grade stenosis was identified by CT/CTA that was expected occluded on MRI/MRA. Two MRI/MRA-confirmed pseudoaneurysms were missed by CT/CTA. None of the controls evidenced specific imaging signs for dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: CT/CTA is a reliable and better available alternative to MRI/MRA for diagnosis of sCAD. CT/CTA should be used to complement MRI/MRA in cases where MRI/MRA suggests occlusion.
Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT angiography (CTA); MR angiography (MRA); MR imaging (MRI); Vascular disease; spontaneous cervical artery dissection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28574627     DOI: 10.1111/jon.12451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Spontaneous craniocervical dissection].

Authors:  M Garner; U Yilmaz; S Behnke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Factors Associated With Ischemic Stroke in Patients Suspected of Cervical Artery Dissection.

Authors:  J Scott McNally; Peter J Hinckley; Akihiko Sakata; Laura B Eisenmenger; Seong-Eun Kim; Adam H De Havenon; Edward P Quigley; Eli Iacob; Gerald S Treiman; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Imaging of Spontaneous and Traumatic Cervical Artery Dissection : Comparison of Typical CT Angiographic Features.

Authors:  Peter B Sporns; Thomas Niederstadt; Walter Heindel; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer; Ralf Dittrich; Uta Hanning
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Safe management of acute cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  Philipp Schleicher; Andreas Pingel; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  A case of multiple Vertebrobasilar artery fenestration misdiagnosed as vertebral artery dissection.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Xiaokai Wang; Xiaohua Li; Huifeng Zheng; Zhiyong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  High-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging for depicting imaging features of unruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms.

Authors:  Binbin Sui; Xiaoyan Bai; Peiyi Gao; Yan Lin; Yisen Zhang; Jia Liang; Xinjian Yang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Long-Term Sonographical Follow-Up of Arterial Stenosis Due to Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection.

Authors:  Daniel Strunk; Wolfram Schwindt; Heinz Wiendl; Ralf Dittrich; Jens Minnerup
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.