Literature DB >> 28574620

Rescue allocation and recipient oriented extended allocation in kidney transplantation-influence of the EUROTRANSPLANT allocation system on recipient selection and graft survival for initially nonaccepted organs.

Roger Wahba1,2, Barbara Suwelack1,3, Wolfgang Arns1,4, Figen Cakiroglu5, Ute Eisenberger1,6, Thorsten Feldkamp1,7, Anita Hansen1,8, Kathrin Ivens1,8, Thomas Klein1,9, Andreas Kribben1,6, Christine Kurschat1,10, Ulrich Lange4, Anja Mühlfeld1,11, Martin Nitschke1,5, Stefan Reuter1,3, Kevin Schulte7, Richard Viebahn1,9, Rainer Woitas1,12, Martin Hellmich13, Dirk L Stippel1,2.   

Abstract

Nonaccepted kidneys grafts enter the rescue allocation (RA) process to avoid discards. In December 2013, recipient oriented extended allocation (REAL) was introduced to improve transparency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of REAL on recipients' selection and graft function compared to the formerly existing RA as well as to identify factors that influence graft outcome. Therefore, a multicenter study of 10 transplant centers in the same region in Germany was performed. All transplantations after RA or REAL from December 1, 2012, until December 31, 2014, with a follow-up time until December 31, 2015 were analyzed. 113 of 941 kidney transplantations were performed after RA or REAL (12%). With REAL, the number of refusals before transplantation had increased (12 ± 7.1 vs. 8.6 ± 8.6, P = 0.036), and cold ischemia time has decreased (13.6 ± 3.6 vs. 17.2 ± 4.8 h, P = 0.019). Recipients after REAL needed significantly more allocation points compared to RA to receive a kidney. One-year graft survival was comparable. If kidneys from the same donor were transplanted to two recipients at one center, the greater the difference in recipient age, the greater the difference in serum creatinine after 12 months (-0.019 mg/dl per year, P = 0.011) was, that is older recipients showed lower creatinine. REAL influences selection of the recipients compared to the former RA era for successful organ receipt. Graft function is comparable and seems to be influenced by recipient age.
© 2017 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expanded criteria donor; kidney allocation; kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28574620     DOI: 10.1111/tri.12993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  2 in total

1.  Prospective Validation of Prediction Model for Kidney Discard.

Authors:  Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Courtenay M Holscher; Madeleine M Waldram; Tanveen Ishaque; Alvin G Thomas; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Expanding the donor pool in kidney transplantation: Should organs with acute kidney injury be accepted?-A retrospective study.

Authors:  Katharina Schütte-Nütgen; Markus Finke; Sabrina Ehlert; Gerold Thölking; Hermann Pavenstädt; Barbara Suwelack; Daniel Palmes; Ralf Bahde; Raphael Koch; Stefan Reuter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.