Literature DB >> 28574326

Healthcare quality improvement work: a professional employee perspective.

Christian Gadolin1, Thomas Andersson1.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze conditions that influence how employees engage in healthcare quality improvement (QI) work. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative case study based on interviews ( n=27) and observations ( n=10). Findings The main conditions that influence how employees engage in healthcare QI work are professions, work structures and working relationships. These conditions can both prevent and facilitate healthcare QI. Professions and work structures may cement existing institutional logics and thus prevent employees from engaging in healthcare QI work. However, attempts to align QI with professional logics, together with work structures that empower employees, can make these conditions increase employee engagement, which can be accomplished through positive working relationships that foster institutional work, which bridge different competing institutional logics, making it possible to overcome barriers that professions and work structures may constitute. Practical implications Understanding the conditions that influence how employees engage in healthcare QI work will make initiatives more likely to succeed. Originality/value Healthcare QI has mainly been studied from an implementer perspective, and employees have either been neglected or seen as passive resisters. Weak employee perspectives make healthcare QI research incomplete. In our research, healthcare QI work is studied closely at the actor level to understand healthcare QI from an employee perspective.

Keywords:  Employee engagement; Institutional logics; Professions; Quality improvement; Relationships; Work structure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28574326     DOI: 10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2016-0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur        ISSN: 0952-6862


  7 in total

Review 1.  A co-creation roadmap towards sustainable quality of care: A multi-method study.

Authors:  Fien Claessens; Deborah Seys; Jonas Brouwers; Astrid Van Wilder; Anneke Jans; Eva Marie Castro; Luk Bruyneel; Dirk De Ridder; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Preconditions for nurses' perceived organizational support in healthcare: a qualitative explorative study.

Authors:  Christian Gadolin; Maria Skyvell Nilsson; Axel Ros; Marianne Törner
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2021-09-13

3.  Patient and staff experiences of quality in Swedish forensic psychiatric care: a repeated cross-sectional survey with yearly sampling at two clinics.

Authors:  Mikael Selvin; Kjerstin Almqvist; Lars Kjellin; Lars-Olov Lundqvist; Agneta Schröder
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2019-02-02

4.  Context counts: a qualitative study exploring the interplay between context and implementation success.

Authors:  Lisa Rogers; Aoife De Brún; Sarah A Birken; Carmel Davies; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Development of a respiratory quality improvement faculty in an acute hospital using QI methodology.

Authors:  Lucy Anne Boast; Judith Anne Hampson; Rachel Louise Saville; Emma Toplis; Abdulla Baguneid; Daniel Alexander Williams; Aklak Choudhury
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-10

6.  The role of professional logics in quality register use: a realist evaluation.

Authors:  Ann-Charlott Norman; Mattias Elg; Annika Nordin; Boel Andersson Gäre; Beatrix Algurén
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  "Navigation to prioritizing the patient" - first-line nurse managers' experiences of participating in a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Berit Mosseng Sjølie; Trude Anita Hartviksen; Terese Bondas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.