Literature DB >> 28573969

Human spiruridiasis due to Physaloptera spp. (Nematoda: Physalopteridae) in a grave of the Shahr-e Sukhteh archeological site of the Bronze Age (2800-2500 BC) in Iran.

Mahsasadat Makki1, Jean Dupouy-Camet2, Seyed Mansour Seyed Sajjadi3, František Moravec4, Saied Reza Naddaf5, Iraj Mobedi1, Hossein Malekafzali1, Mostafa Rezaeian1, Mehdi Mohebali1, Faranak Kargar6, Gholamreza Mowlavi1.   

Abstract

Evidence of rare human helminthiasis in paleoparasitological records is scarce. we report here the finding of Physaloptera spp. eggs in a soil sample collected in the pelvic and sacrum bones area of a skeleton excavated from a grave of Shahr-e Sukhteh archeological site dating back to the Bronze Age. The site is located in southeastern Iran and has attracted the attention of numerous archeological teams owing to its vast expanse and diverse archeological findings since 1997. The spirurid nematodes Physaloptera spp. are rarely the cause of human helminthiasis nowadays, but this infection might not have been so rare in ancient populations such as those in the Shahr-e Sukhteh. Out of 320 skeletons analyzed in this study, only one parasitized individual was detected. This surprising result led us to suspect the role of nematophagous fungi and other taphonomic processes in possible false-negative results. This is the first paleoparasitological study on human remains in this archeological site and the first record of ancient human physalopterosis in the Middle East. © M. Makki et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28573969      PMCID: PMC5467177          DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2017019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasite        ISSN: 1252-607X            Impact factor:   3.000


Introduction

Studying biological remains such as coprolites, burial soils, and latrine sediments obtained from archeological sites provides valuable information concerning paleo diet and/or unusual food items associated with parasitic infections in ancient times [1]. Recognizing parasite life cycles vis-à-vis their environment, host specificity, and personal behavior sheds light on arthropods as intermediate hosts and their role in the transmission of specific parasites to humans. A review of the literature on paleoparasitology illustrates the occurrence of certain parasitic infections among our ancestors in communities in the distant past [3, 13]. The Shahr-e Sukhteh (“Burnt City” in Persian) archeological site (30° 39′ N; 61° 24′ E) in southeastern Iran was discovered in the early 20th century, and the initial portion of the excavation project was performed by Maurizio Tosi, an Italian archeologist, in 1967 [27]. This archeological site is representative of the Bronze Age (3200–1800 BC) in the southeastern plateau of Iran and the items excavated from this site support the presence of societies with developed agriculture and animal husbandry as well as metallurgy at that time [15]. The site territory covers about 151 ha and comprises three distinct areas of residential, industrial and cemetery sections. We had the opportunity to analyze human burial soil from this location, and we report here the finding of Physaloptera eggs, an infrequent human parasite but a common parasite of dogs and cats.

Materials and Methods

Archeological site

The cemetery section of Shahr-e Sukhteh covers about 25 ha (Fig. 1) and includes around 25,000–40,000 graves [23]. Stored pelvic and sacrum bones, from 320 graves, unearthed in previous excavations since 1997 were used in this study. The age of the skeletons was calculated using the 14C method on charcoal obtained from the relevant layers along with the cultural context attribution [24].
Figure 1.

A part of the necropolis in Shahr-e Sukhteh archeological site.

A part of the necropolis in Shahr-e Sukhteh archeological site.

Sampling and microscopic analysis

The soil attached to the surface of the bones, specifically the sacrum foramina (Fig. 2), was collected meticulously and kept in plastic zip bags with the same skeleton code. Two 1 g samples from the collected soils were rehydrated in a trisodium phosphate (TSP) solution [22]. Ten days later, microscopic slides were prepared and mounted in glycerin jelly using double 22 × 22 mm cover slides to check for the presence of helminth eggs as reliably as possible. The retrieved helminth eggs were detected by 100×, 400×, and 1000× magnification, respectively, and photographed using a camera-equipped microscope (LABOMED LX 500). The eggs were identified based on morphologic features and morphometric parameters available in reliable references [2, 21, 28].
Figure 2.

A sacrum showing foramina from which soil samples were examined (burial IUF 2807).

A sacrum showing foramina from which soil samples were examined (burial IUF 2807).

Results

In total, 6711 microscopic slides were thoroughly examined. Out of 320 skeletons analyzed in this study, eggs were detected in soil samples collected from bones of only one skeleton. In one sample (burial IUF 2807, a middle-aged male adult of 35–40 years), six eggs measuring a mean length of 47.9 ± 5.7 and a mean width of 31.5 ± 5.2 μm were collected and were subsequently identified as eggs of Physaloptera spp., a very rare group of spirurid worms in humans. The sizes and the morphological features of Physaloptera spp. eggs exhibiting smooth, thick shells and double counter in addition to the embryo inside the eggs were all in favor of the present diagnosis. The sizes were also compatible with those described in the literature (Table 1, Fig. 3).
Table 1.

Measurements of the identified eggs.

EggNoLength (μm)Width (μm)
155.435.4
253.838.5
Physaloptera spp. 345.730.6
450.434.8
542.927.2
639.623
Mean ± SD 47.9 ± 5.731.5 ± 5.2
Figure 3.

The six Physaloptera spp. eggs found in the soil sample. Note the embryos in A, B, D. Arrows in (B) show the considerable thickness of the egg shell. The diagnosis cannot be made with certainty for the egg in (C). Scale bars = 20 μm. Egg shows a hyalinized state of its content (E).

The six Physaloptera spp. eggs found in the soil sample. Note the embryos in A, B, D. Arrows in (B) show the considerable thickness of the egg shell. The diagnosis cannot be made with certainty for the egg in (C). Scale bars = 20 μm. Egg shows a hyalinized state of its content (E). Measurements of the identified eggs.

Discussion

The genus Physaloptera Rudolphi, 1819 is composed of several species parasitizing a broad range of hosts, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and insects. Most species utilize insects such as crickets, cockroaches, and beetles as intermediate hosts [6]. Physaloptera spp. are also known to infect baboons and chimpanzees as well as other simian primates and the genus was first identified in humans from the Caucasus Mountains in Russia in 1902 [14, 17]. It has also been identified in humans in Africa and South America [26]. Humans acquire the infection by the accidental ingestion of infected arthropods. Physaloptera spp. adults are anchored in the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine and can provoke nausea and diarrhea. Sometimes adults are expelled by vomiting and can be confounded with Ascaris, though Phylasoptera (up to 100 mm in maximum range) are smaller in size [2]. At first glance, the present eggs drew our attention to the eggs of more common parasites such as Ascaris lumbricoides and/or Capillaria spp. It appears that decorticated and immature eggs of A. lumbricoides can be confused in shape with spirurid eggs [6, 17]. In the present study, the deep concentration in the morphology of the eggs in terms of their oval shape and thick-walled appearance together with the larvae inside in three of the eggs (Figs. 3A, 3B and 3D) and the visible “double counter” in one egg (Fig. 3B) were in favor of Physaloptera spp. eggs. The parameters were compatible with reference measurements for Physaloptera eggs: 44–65 by 32–45 for Beaver et al. [2]; 46–51 by 33–37 for Vandepite et al. [28]. However, the absence of a mammillated coat besides the nonspherical shape of the eggs dismissed the initial presumption of A. lumbricoides eggs. Furthermore, the initial apparent similarities of the eggs with capillariid were ruled out based on the morphological appearance described in the literature [12]. Possible Physaloptera eggs have been identified in prehistoric coprolites from South America. In Argentina, these eggs were identified from canid and human coprolites [10, 11]. In Brazil, such eggs were found in feline paleofeces dating back to 9000 years [25]. Cleeland et al. by studying DNA extracted from a 1400-year-old desiccated fecal sample from La Cueva de Los Muertos Chiquitos, archeological site in Mexico, identified Physaloptera DNA by amplifying and sequencing an 18S ribosomal RNA gene specific to Ascaris [6]. In our study, 320 burial soil samples were examined, and only one sample was found to be parasitized; a much lower number than expected initially. Some biotic and abiotic factors are involved in interpreting false-negative results in paleoparasitology [20] and, particularly, the destructive role of nematophagous fungi on helminth ova [18]. In a recent paper, cultures of the soil samples obtained from the residential area of Shahr-e Sukhteh at a depth of 1.5–2 m revealed sporogenic microbes such as Bacillus subtilis and saprophyte fungi such as Aspergillus flavus and Cladosporium sphaerospermum, known to have been responsible for food spoilage at that time [19]. First and foremost among the limitations of the present study is that we had access to only a few eggs. Consequently, future studies in Shahr-e Sukhteh should aim to detect the possible existence of nematophagous fungi and their destructive effects leading to the disappearance of the helminth eggs over time. The discovery of parasitic infections that are common today in archeological sites is frequent worldwide, whereas the scenario of finding rare parasites is infrequent. Nevertheless, the justification for the present Physaloptera spp. eggs can be sought in the inferential process of egg identification and the parasite transmission pattern. Environmental conditions, agricultural factors, and the abundance of sheep and goats, as well as arthropods like beetles, all of which have been described for Shahr-e Sukhteh in its heyday, can evidently support our present findings [4, 7, 8]. Remarkable reports on Physaloptera spp. in different kinds of animals globally, [5, 14] including in Iran [9, 16], especially given the very rare human cases throughout the 20th century, imply a dramatic decline in the chances of human physalopterosis in modern versus ancient times. Human occurrence has never been observed in Iran. Although poor sanitary conditions in 3200 BC should not be ignored in infection transmission, modern human case reports, although rare, can justify the occurrence of spiruridiasis at any time.
  10 in total

Review 1.  The state of the art of paleoparasitological research in the Old World.

Authors:  Françoise Bouchet; Stéphanie Harter; Matthieu Le Bailly
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.743

2.  [1ST CASES OF HUMAN PHYSALOPTERIASIS IN THE CONGO].

Authors:  J VANDEPITTE; J L MICHAUX; A FAIN; F GATTI
Journal:  Ann Soc Belges Med Trop Parasitol Mycol       Date:  1964

3.  Paleoparasitological records in a canid coprolite from Patagonia, Argentina.

Authors:  M H Fugassa; G M Denegri; N H Sardella; A Araújo; R A Guichón; P A Martinez; M T Civalero; C Aschero
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.276

4.  A study on intestinal helminthes of dogs, foxes and jackals in the western part of Iran.

Authors:  A Dalimi; A Sattari; Gh Motamedi
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 5.  Human intestinal parasites in the past: new findings and a review.

Authors:  Marcelo Luiz Carvalho Gonçalves; Adauto Araújo; Luiz Fernando Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.743

6.  Helminths in feline coprolites up to 9000 years in the Brazilian Northeast.

Authors:  Luciana Sianto; Mônica Vieira de Souza; Marcia Chame; Maria de Fátima da Luz; Niéde Guidon; Anne-Marie Pessis; Adauto Araújo
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Taphonomic considerations for the analysis of parasites in archaeological materials.

Authors:  Johnica J Morrow; Jessa Newby; Dario Piombino-Mascali; Karl J Reinhard
Journal:  Int J Paleopathol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.393

8.  Capillaria spp. eggs in Patagonian archaeological sites: statistical analysis of morphometric data.

Authors:  Martín H Fugassa; Verónica Taglioretti; Marcelo Lc Gonçalves; Adauto Araújo; Norma H Sardella; Guillermo M Denegri
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 9.  Paleoparasitology: the origin of human parasites.

Authors:  Adauto Araújo; Karl Reinhard; Luiz Fernando Ferreira; Elisa Pucu; Pedro Paulo Chieffi
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.420

10.  Clarifying Prehistoric Parasitism from a Complementary Morphological and Molecular Approach.

Authors:  Lauren M Cleeland; Mason V Reichard; Raul Y Tito; Karl J Reinhard; Cecil M Lewis
Journal:  J Archaeol Sci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.216

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Zoonotic Abbreviata caucasica in Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) from Senegal.

Authors:  Younes Laidoudi; Hacène Medkour; Maria Stefania Latrofa; Bernard Davoust; Georges Diatta; Cheikh Sokhna; Amanda Barciela; R Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar; Didier Raoult; Domenico Otranto; Oleg Mediannikov
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-06-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.