| Literature DB >> 28573599 |
Eva Ring1, Johanna Johansson2, Camilla Sandström3, Brynhildur Bjarnadóttir4, Leena Finér5, Zane Lībiete6, Elve Lode7,8, Inge Stupak9, Magne Sætersdal10.
Abstract
The forest landscape across the Nordic and Baltic regions hosts numerous lakes and watercourses, which must be included in forest management. In this study, national policy designs regarding protection zones for surface waters on forest land were reviewed and compared for the Nordic countries, Estonia and Latvia. The focus was how each country regulates protection zones, whether they are voluntary or mandatory, and the rationale behind adopting a low or high degree of prescriptiveness. Iceland and Denmark had a low degree of policy prescriptiveness, whereas Norway, Estonia and Latvia had a high degree of prescriptiveness. Sweden and Finland relied to a large extent on voluntary commitments. The prescribed zone widths within the region ranged from 1 m to 5 km. The results indicated that land-use distribution, forest ownership structure and historical and political legacies have influenced the varying degrees of prescriptiveness in the region.Entities:
Keywords: Buffer; Certification; Forestry; Guidelines; Legislation; Riparian
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28573599 PMCID: PMC5639796 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-017-0924-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ambio ISSN: 0044-7447 Impact factor: 5.129