| Literature DB >> 28572970 |
Boyan Gao1,2, Lu Yu1,2, Jie Liu1,3, Thomas T Y Wang4, Yinghua Luo2, Liangli Lucy Yu2, Huijuan Zhang1, Lingxiao Gong1, Jing Wang1,3.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of different home food preparation methods on availability of total phenolic contents (TPC) and radical scavenging components, as well as the selected health beneficial compounds from fresh blueberry and carrot. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis revealed that ground carrots using blenders released significantly greater amount of β-carotene than their chopped counterpart, and blueberry samples prepared with different commercial blenders/grinders released different levels of cyaniding-3-O-glucoside and malvidin-3-O-glucoside. Furthermore, microwaving was able to significantly alter the releasable amounts of cyaniding-3-O-glucoside and malvidin-3-O-glucoside from blueberries. In addition, carrots and blueberries processed using different blenders and chopping with or without microwaving differed in their available levels of TPC, and radical scavenging components against DPPH •, oxygen radicals and HO •, as well as their potential anti-inflammatory activities. Taking together, these results indicated that home food preparation approaches may alter the availability of health components from carrots and blueberries. The results also suggested that the influence may depend on the fruit and vegetable type, but not the price of blenders/grinders.Entities:
Keywords: blueberry; carrot; high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); radical scavenging; total phenolic contents (TPC)
Year: 2017 PMID: 28572970 PMCID: PMC5448383 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1HPLC analysis of β‐carotene in carrot extracts. The results are reported in μg β‐carotene per gram of fresh carrot. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05. HPLC, High performance liquid chromatography
Figure 2HPLC analysis of (a) malvidin‐3‐O‐glucoside and (b) cyanidin‐3‐O‐glucoside in blueberry extracts. The results are reported in μg anthocyanins per gram of fresh carrot. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05
Figure 3Total phenolic contents (TPC) of (a) carrot and (b) blueberry samples. The results are reported in mg gallic acid equivalents per gram of fresh carrot or blueberry. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05
Figure 4Relative DPPH scavenging capacity (RDSC) of (a) carrot and (b) blueberry samples. The results are reported in trolox equivalents per gram of fresh weight. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05
Figure 5Oxygen radical absorbing capacity of (a) carrot and (b) blueberry samples. The results are reported in trolox equivalents per gram of fresh weight. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05
Figure 6Hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity of (a) carrot and (b) blueberry samples calculated to trolox equivalents (TE) on a per fresh weight basis. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05
Figure 7Anti‐inflammatory effects of carrot extracts in RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cells. Control and LPS contained the same concentration of DMSO as all the treatment samples. LPS stands for lipopolysaccharide. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05
Figure 8Anti‐inflammatory effects of blueberry extracts treated with RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cells. Control and LPS contained the same concentration of DMSO as all the treatment samples. LPS stands for lipopolysaccharide. The vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3) of each data point. Bar with different letter represents significant different at p < .05