| Literature DB >> 28572927 |
Victor C Wabali1, Akpevwe Esiri1, Leelee Zitte1,2.
Abstract
Freshly harvested mature tomato fruits were treated with different concentrations of potassium permanganate to evaluate their effect on color and texture of the fruits. This was to determine the degree of acceptability and shelf life of the tomatoes. Fifty grams of mature unripe tomato fruits was washed and weighed into a transparent plastic container containing different concentrations of potassium permanganate (control, 2.5 ppm, 5.0 ppm, 7.5 ppm. 10.0 ppm, 12.5 ppm, and 15.0 ppm). The experiment was carried out in a complete randomized design and replicated four times. All the treatments were refrigerated at a temperature range 14-18°C and a sensory assessment of color and textural changes was carried out through a team of selected panelists using the hedonic scale ranking to determine the degree of acceptability. Results obtained were analyzed using analysis of variance DMRT at 5% level of probability and least significant difference (LSD). Results obtained indicated that 7.5 ppm of potassium permanganate had a preservative effect on color and texture of refrigerated tomatoes. Therefore, the tomatoes were of acceptable color and texture for a period of 21 days as revealed in the result. Color quality had a mean score of 1.64 and texture ranking was 1.73 after 3 weeks of storage.Entities:
Keywords: Postharvest preservation; shelf life and quality; tomatoes
Year: 2016 PMID: 28572927 PMCID: PMC5448385 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Effect of KMnO4 on the color acceptability of tomatoes under cold storage conditions
| Days | Control | 2.5 (ppm) | 5 (ppm) | 7.5 (ppm) | 10 (ppm) | 12.5 (ppm) | 15 (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 5 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 1.75 |
| 6 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.50 |
| 7 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 2.75 |
| 8 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 3.00 |
| 9 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 3.25 |
| 10 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 3.25 |
| 11 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 3.50 |
| 12 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 3.50 |
| 13 | 3.25 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.50 |
| 14 | 3.25 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.75 |
| 15 | 3.25 | 2.75 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.75 |
| 16 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 3.25 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.75 |
| 17 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.75 |
| 18 | 3.75 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 2.75 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.75 |
| 19 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.00 | 4.00 |
| 20 | 3.75 | 4.25 | 4.00 | 3.25 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 4.00 |
| 21 | 3.75 | 4.25 | 4.00 | 3.25 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4.00 |
| Mean | 2.44 | 2.29 | 2.10 | 1.64 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.80 |
Effect of KMnO4 on the texture acceptability of tomatoes under cold storage conditions
| Days | Control | 2.5 (ppm) | 5 (ppm) | 7.5 (ppm) | 10 (ppm) | 12.5 (ppm) | 15 (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 4 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 1.50 | 1.75 |
| 5 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 1.50 | 1.75 |
| 6 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 2.00 | 2.50 |
| 7 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 2.25 | 3.00 |
| 8 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 2.25 | 3.00 |
| 9 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 3.25 |
| 10 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 3.50 |
| 11 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 1.25 | 2.25 | 2.50 | 3.50 |
| 12 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 2.25 | 2.50 | 3.75 |
| 13 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 2.50 | 2.75 | 3.75 |
| 14 | 3.25 | 3.25 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 4.00 |
| 15 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 4.00 |
| 16 | 3.75 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 4.00 |
| 17 | 4.00 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 4.25 |
| 18 | 4.25 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 4.25 |
| 19 | 4.25 | 4.00 | 3.75 | 3.50 | 3.25 | 2.75 | 4.50 |
| 20 | 4.25 | 4.00 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 3.50 | 5.00 |
| 21 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.75 | 4.00 | 4.25 | 3.50 | 5.00 |
| Mean | 2.68 | 2.44 | 2.14 | 1.73 | 2.10 | 2.20 | 3.13 |
The mean of the effect of days on color and texture in cold storage conditions
| Day | Color (cold) | Texture (cold) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0000c | 1.0000d |
| 2 | 1.0000c | 1.0000d |
| 3 | 1.0000c | 1.0000d |
| 4 | 1.0000c | 1.3214d |
| 5 | 1.0000c | 13214d |
| 6 | 1.8214b | 1.7500c |
| 7 | 1.9286b | 1.8929bc |
| 8 | 2.1429ab | 1.9286bc |
| 9 | 2.1786ab | 2.2143ab |
| 10 | 2.1786ab | 2.2500ab |
| 11 | 2.3571a | 2.3571a |
| LSD | 0.4063 | 0.4088 |
LSD, least significant difference.
The treatment mean of color and texture under cold storage conditions
| Treatment (ppm) | Mean color (Cold) | Mean textures (Cold) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.7727b | 1.8636b |
| 2.5 | 1.6591bc | 1.5909bcd |
| 5 | 1.5000bc | 1.5227bcd |
| 7.5 | 1.0909d | 1.0682e |
| 10 | 1.4318c | 1.3636de |
| 12.5 | 1.7273bc | 1.7727bc |
| 15 | 2.1818a | 2.2955a |
| LSD | 0.3241 | 0.3261 |
LSD, least significant difference.
The mean effect of KMnO4 on the color and texture of tomato under cold storage conditions
| Treatment (ppm) | Mean color | Mean texture |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.44 | 2.68 |
| 2.5 | 2.29 | 2.44 |
| 5 | 2.10 | 2.14 |
| 7.5 | 1.64 | 1.73 |
| 10 | 2.10 | 2.10 |
| 12.5 | 2.15 | 2.20 |
| 15 | 2.80 | 3.13 |