| Literature DB >> 28572814 |
Carmen M Ortiz-Bustos1, María L Pérez-Bueno2, Matilde Barón2, Leire Molinero-Ruiz1.
Abstract
Although the impact of Orobanche cumana Wallr. on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) becomes evident with emergence of broomrape shoots aboveground, infection occurs early after sowing, the host physiology being altered during underground parasite stages. Genetic resistance is the most effective control method and one of the main goals of sunflower breeding programmes. Blue-green fluorescence (BGF) and thermal imaging allow non-destructive monitoring of plant diseases, since they are sensitive to physiological disorders in plants. We analyzed the BGF emission by leaves of healthy sunflower plantlets, and we implemented BGF and thermal imaging in the detection of the infection by O. cumana during underground parasite development. Increases in BGF emission were observed in leaf pairs of healthy sunflowers during their development. Lower BGF was consistently detected in parasitized plants throughout leaf expansion and low pigment concentration was detected at final time, supporting the interpretation of a decrease in secondary metabolites upon infection. Parasite-induced stomatal closure and transpiration reduction were suggested by warmer leaves of inoculated sunflowers throughout the experiment. BGF imaging and thermography could be implemented for fast screening of sunflower breeding material. Both techniques are valuable approaches to assess the processes by which O. cumana alters physiology (secondary metabolism and photosynthesis) of sunflower.Entities:
Keywords: Helianthus annuus L.; broomrape; carotenoids; early diagnosis; multicolor fluorescence; thermal detection
Year: 2017 PMID: 28572814 PMCID: PMC5435811 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Progress of blue-green fluorescence emission of the first, second, third and fourth pair of true leaves of a healthy sunflower plant. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean of 8 replications. Time is expressed as weeks after inoculation by transplant.
Figure 2Time-course of multicolour fluorescence emission of . Mean measurements of F440 (A), F520 (B), F440/F520 (C), and F440/F680 (D) of leaves and representative fluorescence images of 8 day-old leaves. Vertical bars represent the standard error of means of 14–48 replications. Analyses of variance at P < 0.05 between inoculated and control plants were conducted and values of significance are shown.
Measurements of pigments concentration (chlorophyll content, carotenoids content and chlorophyll/carotenoids ratio) for the second, third, and fourth leaf pair of sunflower plants inoculated with .
| Chl ( | C | 1359.50 ± 56.58 | 1443.90 ± 51.90 | 1442.00 ± 101.04 |
| I | 1548.60 ± 63.53 | 1515.90 ± 94.95 | 1028.40 ± 67.51 | |
| 0.0462 | 0.5184 | 0.0052 | ||
| Car (x+c)/Fw (μ g/g fresh weight) | C | 239.96 ± 8.24 | 244.74 ± 15.84 | 274.30 ± 19.40 |
| I | 263.57 ± 16.01 | 257.71 ± 22.38 | 203.20 ± 12.13 | |
| 0.2141 | 0.6434 | 0.0091 | ||
| Chl ( | C | 5.92 ± 0.11 | 6.00 ± 0.17 | 5.80 ± 0.11 |
| I | 5.93 ± 0.16 | 5.75 ± 0.22 | 5.07 ± 0.17 | |
Chlorophyll and carotenoids (xanthophylls and carotenes) content is expressed as content of chlorophyll a and b [Chl (a+b)], and [Car (x+c)] respectively, and chlorophyll/carotenoids ratio is expressed as Chl (a+b)/Car (x+c).
Mean ± standard error (SE), n = 7–8.
Level of significance of differences in the variables between control (C) and inoculated (I) plants obtained after analyses of variance according to a completely randomized statistical design.
Figure 3Temperature progress of leaves of Mean measurements of leaf temperature of both treatments. Vertical bars represent the standard error of means of 16–45 replications. Time is expressed as weeks after inoculation. (B) RGB and thermal images of the first two leaf pairs of inoculated and control plants 2.5 weeks after inoculation.
Effect of .
| C | 1.511 ± 0.265 | 0 ± 0.000 | 0 ± 0.000 |
| I | 1.163 ± 0.176 | 0.2932 ± 0.115 | 17.38 ± 4.132 |
| 0.2926 |
Mean ± standard error, n = 8.
Level of significance of differences of root fresh weight between control (C) and inoculated (I) plants obtained after analysis of variance according to a completely randomized statistical design.