| Literature DB >> 28572709 |
Abstract
Cyanobacterial blooms are undesirable for ecological and health reasons. While Woronichinia naegeliana is a cyanobacterial species that appears frequently in freshwater, information about it is limited. An evaluation of its toxicity was conducted via tests based on the crustaceans Thamnocephalus platyurus and Daphnia pulex. The greatest effect of the aqueous extract obtained from W. naegeliana cells was observed for T. platyurus. The denoted semi-lethal concentration (LC50) after 24 h of exposure was 0.99 mg of dry weight (d.w.) mL-1. A lower toxicity was displayed for D. pulex, although it grew with time. Among the 18 fractions separated from cyanobacterial extract, only one containing the microginin FR3 (MG-FR3) displayed biological activeness against T. platyurus. The remaining products synthesized by W. naegeliana displayed an absence or a low level of toxicity making it impossible to determine the LC50 value. Detailed research revealed that MG-FR3 did not affect the activity of enzymes such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase and thrombin, which indicates another mode of action. The results demonstrated that blooms of W. naegeliana showed toxic activity towards invertebrate zooplankton.Entities:
Keywords: Bioassays; Cyanobacteria; Cyanopeptides; Microginins
Year: 2017 PMID: 28572709 PMCID: PMC5429910 DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1062-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Phycol ISSN: 0921-8971 Impact factor: 3.215
Toxicity of the extract from Woronichinia naegeliana cells assessed with crustaceans’ bioassays expressed as 50% effective concentrations (LC50—mortality concentration; EC50—mobility inhibitory concentration). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5)
| Extract exposure | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Organism | Time (h) | Response type | Concentration (mg dry weight mL−1) |
|
| 24 | LC50 | 0.99 ± 0.25 |
|
| 24 | EC50 | 5.21 ± 0.38 |
| 48 | EC50 | 2.94 ± 0.20 | |
Fig. 1Chromatogram of extract obtained from Woronichinia naegeliana cells monitored at 220 nm. Letters match the fractions described in Table 2
Percent of dead Thamnocephalus platyurus larvae exposed for 24 h to separate fractions extracted from 10 mg d.w. mL−1 Woronichinia naegeliana cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5)
| Fraction | Fraction compositiona | Retention time (min) | (%) of dead |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Microginin FR3 | 9.2 | 100.0 ± 0.0 |
| B | Microginin FR4 | 10.7 | 14.0 ± 5.5 |
| C | Micropeptin T2 | 11.4 | 22.0 ± 8.4 |
| D | Micropeptin 478-B | 12.3 | 16.0 ± 11.4 |
| E | Micropeptin 88D | 12.8 | 30.0 ± 7.1 |
| F | Cyanopeptolin 880 | 13.6 | 20.0 ± 0.0 |
| G | Unknown compound 791 Da | 17.0 | 24.0 ± 5.5 |
| H | Microginin 757 | 18.1 | 16.0 ± 5.5 |
| I | Cyanopeptolin 914, unknown compound 874 Da | 19.0 | 6.0 ± 5.5 |
| J | Unknown compounds—1013 and 973 Da | 19.7 | 24.0 ± 8.9 |
| K | Micropeptin SD999, unknown compound 1039 Da | 20.4 | 22.0 ± 8.4 |
| L | Unknown compound 1047 Da | 21.8 | 32.0 ± 4.5 |
| M | Microcystin-LR, microginin 91E, planktopeptin BL1061, unknown compound 1123 Da | 23.1 | 26.0 ± 5.5 |
| N | Cyanopeptolin 908, oscillamide B | 24.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 |
| O | Cyanopeptolin B, unknown compound 888 Da | 24.4 | 8.0 ± 4.5 |
| P | Cyanopeptolin C, unknown compound 902 Da | 27.2 | 40.0 ± 7.1 |
| Q | Microginin 51A, cyanopeptolin D, unknown compounds—1061, 1021 and 812 Da | 28.2 | 8.0 ± 4.5 |
| R | Microginin 478 | 30.0 | 8.0 ± 4.5 |
aFraction composition was determined according to Bober et al. 2011
Fig. 2a Chromatogram of fraction A contained microginin FR3 monitored at 220 nm, b ion mass spectrum of microginin FR3 and c MS/MS product ion spectrum of microginin FR3 (m/z 728.5 Da) inside the structure of microginin FR3
The enzyme inhibitory activities of MG-FR3 (IC50—50% inhibitory concentration)
| Enzyme | IC50 (μg mL−1) |
|---|---|
| Trypsin | >40 |
| Chymotrypsin | >40 |
| Elastase | >40 |
| Thrombin | >100 |
Comparison of the biological sensitivity of Thamnocephalus platyurus and Daphnia pulex exposed to aqueous extracts from various species of cyanobacteria. Data are presented as was described in Table 1
| Cyanobacterial extract |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.99 ± 0.25 | 5.21 ± 0.38 |
|
| 0.11 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 1.2 |
|
| 0.35 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 1.2 |
|
| 3.7 ± 1.9 | 12.3 ± 2.6 |
aData obtained in this study
bData published by Maršálek and Bláha (2004)
cPercent in parenthesis represents the content of a given species in the studied cyanobacterial biomass