Literature DB >> 28572496

Effect of age, diet, and tissue type on PCr response to creatine supplementation.

Marina Yazigi Solis1, Guilherme Giannini Artioli2,3, Maria Concepción García Otaduy1, Claudia da Costa Leite1, Walquiria Arruda4, Raquel Ramos Veiga4, Bruno Gualano5,2.   

Abstract

Creatine/phosphorylcreatine (PCr) responses to creatine supplementation may be modulated by age, diet, and tissue, but studies assessing this possibility are lacking. Therefore we aimed to determine whether PCr responses vary as a function of age, diet, and tissue. Fifteen children, 17 omnivorous and 14 vegetarian adults, and 18 elderly individuals ("elderly") participated in this study. Participants were given placebo and subsequently creatine (0.3 g·kg-1·day-1) for 7 days in a single-blind fashion. PCr was measured through phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) in muscle and brain. Creatine supplementation increased muscle PCr in children (P < 0.0003) and elderly (P < 0.001), whereas the increase in omnivores did not reach statistically significant difference (P = 0.3348). Elderly had greater PCr increases than children and omnivores (P < 0.0001 for both), whereas children experienced greater PCr increases than omnivores (P = 0.0022). In relation to diet, vegetarians (P < 0.0001), but not omnivores, had significant increases in muscle PCr content. Brain PCr content was not affected by creatine supplementation in any group, and delta changes in brain PCr (-0.7 to +3.9%) were inferior to those in muscle PCr content (+10.3 to +27.6%; P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). PCr responses to a standardized creatine protocol (0.3 g·kg-1·day-1 for 7 days) may be affected by age, diet, and tissue. Whereas creatine supplementation was able to increase muscle PCr in all groups, although to different extents, brain PCr was shown to be unresponsive overall. These findings demonstrate the need to tailor creatine protocols to optimize creatine/PCr accumulation both in muscle and in brain, enabling a better appreciation of the pleiotropic properties of creatine.NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY A standardized creatine supplementation protocol (0.3 g·kg-1·day-1 for 7 days) effectively increased muscle, but not brain, phosphorylcreatine. Older participants responded better than younger participants whereas vegetarians responded better than omnivores. Responses to supplementation are thus dependent on age, tissue, and diet. This suggests that a single "universal" protocol, originally designed for increasing muscle creatine in young individuals, may lead to heterogeneous muscle responses in different populations or even no responses in tissues other than skeletal muscle.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adults; brain; children; elderly; phosphorylcreatine; skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28572496     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00248.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  14 in total

1.  Perspective: Creatine, a Conditionally Essential Nutrient: Building the Case.

Authors:  Sergej M Ostojic; Scott C Forbes
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 11.567

2.  No evidence for brown adipose tissue activation after creatine supplementation in adult vegetarians.

Authors:  Niels J Connell; Daniel Doligkeit; Charlotte Andriessen; Esther Kornips-Moonen; Yvonne M H Bruls; Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling; Tineke van de Weijer; Wouter D van Marken-Lichtenbelt; Bas Havekes; Lawrence Kazak; Bruce M Spiegelman; Joris Hoeks; Patrick Schrauwen
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2021-01-18

Review 3.  Effect of creatine supplementation during resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philip D Chilibeck; Mojtaba Kaviani; Darren G Candow; Gordon A Zello
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-02

Review 4.  Benefits of Creatine Supplementation for Vegetarians Compared to Omnivorous Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mojtaba Kaviani; Keely Shaw; Philip D Chilibeck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Safety of Creatine Supplementation in Active Adolescents and Youth: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Andrew R Jagim; Richard A Stecker; Patrick S Harty; Jacob L Erickson; Chad M Kerksick
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-11-28

Review 6.  Variables Influencing the Effectiveness of Creatine Supplementation as a Therapeutic Intervention for Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Darren G Candow; Scott C Forbes; Philip D Chilibeck; Stephen M Cornish; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2019-08-09

Review 7.  Creatine Supplementation and Brain Health.

Authors:  Hamilton Roschel; Bruno Gualano; Sergej M. Ostojic; Eric S. Rawson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Creatine Supplementation in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Andrew R Jagim; Chad M Kerksick
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Creatine Levels in Patients with Phenylketonuria and Mild Hyperphenylalaninemia: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elvira Verduci; Maria Teresa Carbone; Laura Fiori; Claudia Gualdi; Giuseppe Banderali; Claudia Carducci; Vincenzo Leuzzi; Giacomo Biasucci; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 10.  Muscular Atrophy and Sarcopenia in the Elderly: Is There a Role for Creatine Supplementation?

Authors:  Eimear Dolan; Guilherme G Artioli; Rosa Maria R Pereira; Bruno Gualano
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.