Literature DB >> 28572060

Multifocal tDCS targeting the resting state motor network increases cortical excitability beyond traditional tDCS targeting unilateral motor cortex.

D B Fischer1, P J Fried2, G Ruffini3, O Ripolles4, R Salvador5, J Banus6, W T Ketchabaw2, E Santarnecchi2, A Pascual-Leone2, M D Fox7.   

Abstract

Scientists and clinicians have traditionally targeted single brain regions with stimulation to modulate brain function and disease. However, brain regions do not operate in isolation, but interact with other regions through networks. As such, stimulation of one region may impact and be impacted by other regions in its network. Here we test whether the effects of brain stimulation can be enhanced by simultaneously targeting a region and its network, identified with resting state functional connectivity MRI. Fifteen healthy participants received two types of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a traditional two-electrode montage targeting a single brain region (left primary motor cortex [M1]) and a novel eight-electrode montage targeting this region and its associated resting state network. As a control, 8 participants also received multifocal tDCS mismatched to this network. Network-targeted tDCS more than doubled the increase in left M1 excitability over time compared to traditional tDCS and the multifocal control. Modeling studies suggest these results are unlikely to be due to tDCS effects on left M1 itself, however it is impossible to completely exclude this possibility. It also remains unclear whether multifocal tDCS targeting a network selectively modulates this network and which regions within the network are most responsible for observed effects. Despite these limitations, network-targeted tDCS appears to be a promising approach for enhancing tDCS effects beyond traditional stimulation targeting a single brain region. Future work is needed to test whether these results extend to other resting state networks and enhance behavioral or therapeutic effects.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FMRI; Functional connectivity; Network stimulation; Resting state; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28572060     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  33 in total

1.  Awakening: Predicting external stimulation to force transitions between different brain states.

Authors:  Gustavo Deco; Josephine Cruzat; Joana Cabral; Enzo Tagliazucchi; Helmut Laufs; Nikos K Logothetis; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Discovering the individual brain: brain stimulation in psychiatry : Editorial I to the supplement from the 2nd European conference on brain stimulation in psychiatry.

Authors:  Frank Padberg; Anna-Katharine Brem; Ulrich Palm; Oliver Pogarell; Alkomiet Hasan; Jerôme Brunelin; Chris Baeken; Emmanuel Poulet; Berthold Langguth; Daniel Keeser
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the sensory-motor regions inhibits gamma synchrony.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Giorgio Arcara; Giovanni Di Pino; Cristina Turco; Matteo Maran; Luca Weis; Francesco Piccione; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Multitarget transcranial direct current stimulation for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Moria Dagan; Talia Herman; Rachel Harrison; Junhong Zhou; Nir Giladi; Giulio Ruffini; Brad Manor; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 10.338

6.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Targeting neural oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Justin Riddle; Flavio Frohlich
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

Review 8.  Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Aurore Thibaut; Beatriz Costa; Isadora Ferreira; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.166

9.  Patient-Tailored, Home-Based Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Memory Deficits in Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Lucie Bréchet; Wanting Yu; Maria Chiara Biagi; Giulio Ruffini; Margaret Gagnon; Brad Manor; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Targeted tDCS Mitigates Dual-Task Costs to Gait and Balance in Older Adults.

Authors:  Junhong Zhou; Brad Manor; Wanting Yu; On-Yee Lo; Natalia Gouskova; Ricardo Salvador; Racheli Katz; Pablo Cornejo Thumm; Marina Brozgol; Giulio Ruffini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lewis A Lipsitz; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 11.274

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.