Literature DB >> 28571174

Comparison of Steroid and Itraconazole for Prevention of Recurrence in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Moirangthem Rojita1, Swagatika Samal2, Pradeep Pradhan3, V P Venkatachalam4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is due to the continuous exposure of fungal antigens to an atopic individual. Medical treatment following the surgery is the standard protocol often practiced for the treatment of AFRS. Steroid (systemic/topical) has been considered as the standard medical treatment for the control of the disease in AFRS although most of the patients show recurrence with long term follow up. Instead, antifungals (itraconazole) can be tried to decrease the recurrence rate which acts by inhibiting the fungal growth in the postoperative period. AIM: In the current study, we have compared the efficacy between steroid and the itraconazole in preventing the recurrence of the disease in patients with AFRS in postoperative period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary care referral hospital from October 2013 to February 2015. Total 60 patients with AFRS with nasal polyposis, diagnosed by Bent-Kuhn's criteria were included in the study. For patients of Group A (containing 30 patients), systemic steroid (oral prednisolone 30 mg OD) was continued for one month and afterwards topical steroid (nasal spray) was continued till six months after surgery. In Group B (containing 30 patients), oral itraconazole (100 mg BID) was continued for six months. Clinical and haematological parameters were compared at the end of six months.
RESULTS: The average pre-treatment and post treatment scores of Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC) in the patients of Group A was 532 μg/l and 482 μg/l respectively and the corresponding values in Group B were 578 μg/L and 438 μg/L respectively at the end of six months (p=0.912). Similarly, the preoperative and postoperative serum IgE level in Group A was 886.20 IU/ml and 620 IU/ml and the respective values in Group B were 935 IU/ml and 570 IU/ml (p=0.555). Mean preoperative and postoperative mean SNOT score in Group A and Group B were 52.5 in 34.3 and respective values in Group B were 55.7 and 29.5.
CONCLUSION: Itraconazole can be considered as an effective treatment alternative to the steroid for postoperative management of AFRS. Although there was no significant difference noted between two groups, patients treated with itraconazole had a better symptomatic relief and endoscopic clearance of disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute eosinophil count; Antifungals; Endoscopic sinus surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28571174      PMCID: PMC5449820          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23488.9610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  11 in total

1.  Preoperative diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis.

Authors:  Muthuswamy Dhiwakar; Alok Thakar; Sudhir Bahadur; Chitra Sarkar; Uma Banerji; Kumut Kumar Handa; Sunil Kumar Chhabra
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Prevalence of allergic fungal sinusitis in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis in adult Malaysians.

Authors:  Bee-See Goh; Balwant Singh Gendeh; Isa Mohamed Rose; Sabiha Pit; Shamim Abdul Samad
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: our experience.

Authors:  F A Kuhn; A R Javer
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-10

Review 4.  Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Matthew W Ryan; Bradley F Marple
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Allergic fungal sinusitis: learning from our failures.

Authors:  B F Marple; R L Mabry
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

6.  The role of antifungal therapy in the prevention of recurrent allergic fungal rhinosinusitis after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Yaser Khalil; Adel Tharwat; Asmaa Gaber Abdou; Enas Essa; Abdel Hamid Elsawy; Abdel Hamid Essawy; Osama Elnakib; Nada Farag Elnaidany
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.697

7.  Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis.

Authors:  J P Bent; F A Kuhn
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Antifungal treatment and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Devyani Lal; James A Stankiewicz
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Effectiveness of itraconazole in the management of refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Kwai-Onn Chan; Krista A Genoway; Amin R Javer
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-12

10.  Evaluation and treatment of allergic fungal sinusitis. II. Treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  M S Schubert; D W Goetz
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Topical and systemic antifungal therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Karen Head; Steve Sharp; Lee-Yee Chong; Claire Hopkins; Carl Philpott
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-10

Review 2.  Current understanding of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Matthew A Tyler; Amber U Luong
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-09

Review 3.  Current and Alternative Therapies for Nasal Mucosa Injury: A Review.

Authors:  Jegadevswari Selvarajah; Aminuddin Bin Saim; Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus; Yogeswaran Lokanathan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.