| Literature DB >> 28570585 |
James Obindo1, Jibril Abdulmalik2, Emeka Nwefoh3, Michael Agbir1, Charles Nwoga1, Aishatu Armiya'u1, Francis Davou1, Kurkat Maigida1, Emmanuel Otache1, Ajuma Ebiloma1, Samuel Dakwak4, John Umaru5, Elisha Samuel6, Christopher Ogoshi6, Julian Eaton7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis is a chronic, disabling and often disfiguring condition that principally impacts the world's poorest people. In addition to the well-recognised physical disability associated with lymphedema and hydrocele, affected people often experience rejection, stigma and discrimination. The resulting emotional consequences are known to impact on the quality of life and the functioning of the affected individuals. However, the management of this condition has focused on prevention and treatment through mass drug administration, with scant attention paid to the emotional impact of the condition on affected individuals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and severity of depression among individuals with physical disfigurement from lymphatic filariasis in Plateau State, Nigeria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28570585 PMCID: PMC5453421 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| <18 | 3 | 3.2 |
| 19–30 | 10 | 10.6 |
| 31–40 | 9 | 9.6 |
| 41–50 | 15 | 16.0 |
| 51–60 | 18 | 19.1 |
| >60 | 39 | 41.5 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Female | 58 | 61.7 |
| Male | 36 | 38.3 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Married | 48 | 51.1 |
| Never married | 13 | 13.8 |
| Separated/Divorced/Widowed | 33 | 35.1 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Christianity | 72 | 76.6 |
| Islam | 16 | 17.0 |
| Traditional Worshipper | 6 | 6.4 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Full time | 57 | 60.6 |
| Part time | 7 | 7.4 |
| Retired | 9 | 9.6 |
| Unemployed+ | 21 | 22.3 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| No formal | 44 | 46.8 |
| Primary | 21 | 22.3 |
| Secondary | 17 | 18.1 |
| Tertiary | 10 | 10.6 |
| Others | 2 | 2.1 |
| Total | 94 | 100.0 |
| Artisan | 3 | 3.2 |
| Civil Servant | 5 | 5.3 |
| Farming | 35 | 37.2 |
| Student | 4 | 4.3 |
| Trading/Business | 14 | 14.9 |
| Unemployed | 26 | 27.7 |
| Others | 7 | 7.4 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
* = Adult education
** = Driver, bike rider, security personnel etc., + = unemployed or current students
History of mental illness, economic status, functioning and adequacy of support.
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Present | 10 | 10.6 |
| Absent | 84 | 89.4 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Present | 2 | 2.1 |
| Absent | 92 | 97.9 |
| Total | 94 | 100.0 |
| Pension | 2 | 2.1 |
| Personal earning | 62 | 66.0 |
| Support from family/friends | 30 | 31.9 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Adequate | 32 | 34.0 |
| Not adequate | 62 | 66.0 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Adequate | 17 | 18.1 |
| Not adequate | 77 | 81.9 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| Poor | 21 | 22.3 |
| Average | 56 | 59.6 |
| Good | 17 | 18.1 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| ≤5,000 | 63 | 67.0 |
| 5,001–10,000 | 8 | 8.5 |
| >10,000 | 23 | 24.5 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| 1–10 | 33 | 35.1 |
| 11–20 | 28 | 29.8 |
| 21–30 | 10 | 10.6 |
| >30 | 23 | 24.5 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
**** = it is highly skewed
Fig 1Severity of depression among respondents.
Prevalence of depression and low self-esteem.
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Depressed | 19 | 20.0 |
| Not depressed | 75 | 79.8 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
| High self esteem | 25 | 26.6 |
| Low self esteem | 69 | 73.4 |
| 94 | 100.0 | |
Predictors of depression.
| Factors | odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Present | 0.63 | 0.005–7.7860 | 0.715 |
| Absent | 1 | - | - |
| Present | 40.83 | 1.6300–5.3403 | 0.008 |
| Absent | 1 | - | - |
| High | 0.09 | 0.0183–0.4594 | 0.004 |
| Low | 1 | - | - |
| 11–20 | 5.02 | 0.8299–30.4181 | 0.079 |
| 21–30 | 1.41 | 0.0951–20.8282 | 0.804 |
| > 30 | 4.71 | 0.6693–33.0767 | 0.120 |
| 1–10 | 1 | - | - |
| Part time | 1.25 | 0.1351–11.5473 | 0.845 |
| Retired | 0.00 | 0.000 >1.0E12 | 0.964 |
| Unemployed | 12.71 | 2.4510–6.7005 | 0.003 |
| Full time | 1 | - | - |
*Statistically Significant, though sample size was too small to assess the impact