PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the rapidly evolving spectrum of autoimmune neurologic disorders with a focus on those that involve the central nervous system, providing an understanding of how to approach the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with central nervous system symptoms or signs that could be immune mediated, either paraneoplastic or idiopathic, to guide therapeutic decision making. RECENT FINDINGS: The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in the discovery of novel neural antibodies and their targets. Many commercial laboratories can now test for these antibodies, which serve as diagnostic markers of diverse neurologic disorders that occur on an autoimmune basis. Some are highly specific for certain cancer types, and the neural antibody profiles may help direct the physician's cancer search. SUMMARY: The diagnosis of an autoimmune neurologic disorder is aided by the detection of an objective neurologic deficit (usually subacute in onset with a fluctuating course), the presence of a neural autoantibody, and improvement in the neurologic status after a course of immunotherapy. Neural autoantibodies should raise concern for a paraneoplastic etiology and may inform a targeted oncologic evaluation (eg, N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antibodies are associated with teratoma, antineuronal nuclear antibody type 1 [ANNA-1, or anti-Hu] are associated with small cell lung cancer). MRI, EEG, functional imaging, videotaped evaluations, and neuropsychological evaluations provide objective evidence of neurologic dysfunction by which the success of immunotherapy may be measured. Most treatment information emanates from retrospective case series and expert opinion. Nonetheless, early intervention may allow reversal of deficits in many patients and prevention of future disability.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the rapidly evolving spectrum of autoimmune neurologic disorders with a focus on those that involve the central nervous system, providing an understanding of how to approach the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with central nervous system symptoms or signs that could be immune mediated, either paraneoplastic or idiopathic, to guide therapeutic decision making. RECENT FINDINGS: The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in the discovery of novel neural antibodies and their targets. Many commercial laboratories can now test for these antibodies, which serve as diagnostic markers of diverse neurologic disorders that occur on an autoimmune basis. Some are highly specific for certain cancer types, and the neural antibody profiles may help direct the physician's cancer search. SUMMARY: The diagnosis of an autoimmune neurologic disorder is aided by the detection of an objective neurologic deficit (usually subacute in onset with a fluctuating course), the presence of a neural autoantibody, and improvement in the neurologic status after a course of immunotherapy. Neural autoantibodies should raise concern for a paraneoplastic etiology and may inform a targeted oncologic evaluation (eg, N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antibodies are associated with teratoma, antineuronal nuclear antibody type 1 [ANNA-1, or anti-Hu] are associated with small cell lung cancer). MRI, EEG, functional imaging, videotaped evaluations, and neuropsychological evaluations provide objective evidence of neurologic dysfunction by which the success of immunotherapy may be measured. Most treatment information emanates from retrospective case series and expert opinion. Nonetheless, early intervention may allow reversal of deficits in many patients and prevention of future disability.
Authors: Catherine R Garcia; Rani Jayswal; Val Adams; Lowell B Anthony; John L Villano Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Caleigh Mandel-Brehm; Divyanshu Dubey; Thomas J Kryzer; Brian D O'Donovan; Baouyen Tran; Sara E Vazquez; Hannah A Sample; Kelsey C Zorn; Lillian M Khan; Ian O Bledsoe; Andrew McKeon; Samuel J Pleasure; Vanda A Lennon; Joseph L DeRisi; Michael R Wilson; Sean J Pittock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Batool F Kirmani; Donald Barr; Diana Mungall Robinson; Zachary Pranske; Ekokobe Fonkem; Jared Benge; Jason H Huang; Geoffrey Ling Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Sumanth Shivaram; Madhu Nagappa; Doniparthi V Seshagiri; Anita Mahadevan; Yashwanth Gangadhar; T N Sathyaprabha; Vijay Kumavat; Rose D Bharath; Sanjib Sinha; Arun B Taly Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 1.383
Authors: Bart K Chwalisz; James Hillis; Amanda C Guidon; Leeann B Burton; Teilo H Schaller; Anthony A Amato; Allison Betof Warner; Priscilla K Brastianos; Tracey A Cho; Stacey L Clardy; Justine V Cohen; Jorg Dietrich; Michael Dougan; Christopher T Doughty; Divyanshu Dubey; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Jeffrey T Guptill; Douglas B Johnson; Vern C Juel; Robert Kadish; Noah Kolb; Nicole R LeBoeuf; Jenny Linnoila; Andrew L Mammen; Maria Martinez-Lage; Meghan J Mooradian; Jarushka Naidoo; Tomas G Neilan; David A Reardon; Krista M Rubin; Bianca D Santomasso; Ryan J Sullivan; Nancy Wang; Karin Woodman; Leyre Zubiri; William C Louv; Kerry L Reynolds Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 13.751