Literature DB >> 28569830

Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast.

Benjamin List.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28569830     DOI: 10.1038/546009a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Jonathan M Dugan; Daniel Graziotin; Damien C Jacques; François Waldner; Daniel Mietchen; Yehia Elkhatib; Lauren B Collister; Christina K Pikas; Tom Crick; Paola Masuzzo; Anthony Caravaggi; Devin R Berg; Kyle E Niemeyer; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Sara Mannheimer; Lillian Rigling; Daniel S Katz; Bastian Greshake Tzovaras; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Nazeefa Fatima; Marta Poblet; Marios Isaakidis; Dasapta Erwin Irawan; Sébastien Renaut; Christopher R Madan; Lisa Matthias; Jesper Nørgaard Kjær; Daniel Paul O'Donnell; Cameron Neylon; Sarah Kearns; Manojkumar Selvaraju; Julien Colomb
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-20

2.  Internet Dilettantes' Crowd-Based Peer Review: An Exercise in Mediocrity.

Authors:  Douglas E Ott
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Responsible handling of ethics in data publication.

Authors:  Daniella Lowenberg; Iratxe Puebla
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.029

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.