Literature DB >> 28568992

APHID DISTRIBUTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF GOLDENROD RESISTANCE.

Diana Pilson1.   

Abstract

Although there is considerable evidence indicating that herbivory is detrimental to plant fitness, some recent studies of the evolution of plant resistance have concluded that insects do not impose selection on their host plants. A previously untested assumption that underlies most studies of the evolution of plant resistance is that insect distribution patterns are controlled directly by the effects of plant genotype on insect preference and performance. The experiments described here explicitly tested this assumption using the specialist herbivore Uroleucon tissoti (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its host plant Solidago altissima (Asteraceae). Measures of aphid preference and performance were used to predict aphid distribution patterns, and then the predicted distribution patterns were compared with the natural distribution pattern. Although goldenrod genotype had a strong effect on aphid distribution, aphid distribution was not controlled directly by the effect of goldenrod genotype on aphid preference and performance. Instead, a second experiment demonstrated that aphid and spittlebug (Philaenus spumarius and Lepyronia quadrangularis Homoptera: Cercopidae) distribution is controlled largely by genetic variation for resistance to a suite of "branch-causing" herbivores. These herbivores induce branching and aphids and spittlebugs are more abundant on branched plants than unbranched plants. These results indicate that any natural selection imposed by aphids and spittlebugs on goldenrod will depend on the presence or absence of branch-causing herbivores. Thus, selection for plant resistance may depend as much on the assemblage of insect species present as on the identity of each individual species. © 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Herbivore distribution; Lepyronia quadrangularis; Philaenus spumarius; Solidago altissima; Uroleucon tissoti; herbivore interactions; herbivore performance; herbivore preference; plant resistance

Year:  1992        PMID: 28568992     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis: loss of defense against generalist but not specialist herbivores.

Authors:  Helen M Hull-Sanders; Robert Clare; Robert H Johnson; Gretchen A Meyer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Effect of water availability on the phenotypic expression of herbivore resistance in northern red oak seedlings (Quercus rubra L.).

Authors:  Kirk A Stowe; Victoria L Sork; Andrew W Farrell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Additive genetic effects in interacting species jointly determine the outcome of caterpillar herbivory.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; Tara Saley; Casey Philbin; Su'ad A Yoon; Eva Perry; Michelle E Sneck; Joshua G Harrison; C Alex Buerkle; James A Fordyce; Chris C Nice; Craig D Dodson; Sarah L Lebeis; Lauren K Lucas; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Herbivore Biodiversity Varies with Patch Size in an Urban Archipelago.

Authors:  Robert F Bode; Ashleigh Maciejewski
Journal:  Int J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-05-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.