Literature DB >> 28568934

QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND POPULATION DYNAMICS.

Michael Doebeli1.   

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of a competition and a host-parasite model in which the interactions are determined by quantitative characters. Both models are extensions of one-dimensional difference equations that can exhibit complicated dynamics. Compared to these basic models, the phenotypic variability given by the quantitative characters reduces the size of the density fluctuations in asexual populations. With sexual reproduction, which is described by modeling the genetics of the quantitative character explicitly with many haploid loci that determine the character additively, this reduction in fitness variance is magnified. Moreover, quantitative genetics can induce simple dynamics. For example, the sexual population can have a two-cycle when the asexual system is chaotic. This paper discusses the consequences for the evolution of sex. The higher mean growth rate implied by the lower fitness variance in sexual populations is an advantage that can overcome a twofold intrinsic growth rate of asexuals. The advantage is bigger when the asexual population contains only a subset of the phenotypes present in the sexual population, which conforms with the tangled bank theory for the evolution of sex and shows that tangled bank effects also occur in host-parasite systems. The results suggest that explicitly describing the genetics of a quantitative character leads to more flexible models than the usual assumption of normal character distributions, and therefore to a better understanding of the character's impact on population dynamics. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chaos; evolution of sex; population dynamics; quantitative genetics

Year:  1996        PMID: 28568934     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03866.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Sex and space destabilize intransitive competition within and between species.

Authors:  Mark Vellend; Isabelle Litrico
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Covarying variances: more morphologically variable populations also exhibit more diet variation.

Authors:  Lisa K Snowberg; Kimberly M Hendrix; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Resource diversity promotes among-individual diet variation, but not genomic diversity, in lake stickleback.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Kimberly M Ballare
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  How does genetic architecture affect eco-evolutionary dynamics? A theoretical perspective.

Authors:  Masato Yamamichi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Does intraspecific size variation in a predator affect its diet diversity and top-down control of prey?

Authors:  Travis Ingram; William E Stutz; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cryptic Biological Invasions: a General Model of Hybridization.

Authors:  Claudio S Quilodrán; Frédéric Austerlitz; Mathias Currat; Juan I Montoya-Burgos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Florivory indirectly decreases the plant reproductive output through changes in pollinator attraction.

Authors:  Kaoru Tsuji; Takayuki Ohgushi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Host-parasite fluctuating selection in the absence of specificity.

Authors:  Alex Best; Ben Ashby; Andy White; Roger Bowers; Angus Buckling; Britt Koskella; Mike Boots
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites.

Authors:  Lydia J Buckingham; Ben Ashby
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.516

10.  Genomic plasticity and rapid host switching can promote the evolution of generalism: a case study in the zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter.

Authors:  Dan J Woodcock; Peter Krusche; Norval J C Strachan; Ken J Forbes; Frederick M Cohan; Guillaume Méric; Samuel K Sheppard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.