Literature DB >> 28568885

EVOLUTION OF BROAD AND SPECIFIC COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN NOVEL VERSUS FAMILIAR ENVIRONMENTS IN DROSOPHILA SPECIES.

Amitabh Joshi1, John N Thompson2.   

Abstract

We used nine pairs of competing Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans populations to test three hypotheses. (1) Weaker competitors undergo greater evolutionary increases in competitive ability, compared with stronger ones. (2) Increased competitive ability against a specific competitor population causes a correlated increase in competitive ability against other competitor populations. (3) In a novel environment, adaptation to the abiotic environment contributes more to competitive ability than adaptation to the competitor population. After 11 generations of competition, initially weaker competitor populations showed relatively greater increases in competitive ability. Broad and specific competitive abilities, the latter being specific to a particular competitor population, were positively correlated in both familiar and novel environments. Adaptation to the abiotic environment seemed to be a more important component of competitive ability in the novel environments. We conclude that in geographically structured species, biotic and abiotic factors affecting the evolution of competitive ability may interact to help create a mosaic of outcomes that can affect the evolutionary dynamics of the interaction over the range of the competing species. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Broad competitive ability; Drosophila; competition; specific competitive ability

Year:  1996        PMID: 28568885     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Variation in the relative magnitude of intraspecific and interspecific competitive effects in novel versus familiar environments in two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 3.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Coevolution of competing Callosobruchus species does not stabilize coexistence.

Authors:  Stephen J Hausch; Jeremy W Fox; Steven M Vamosi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.