Literature DB >> 28568876

CONDUCTING PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE STUDIES WHEN THE PHYLOGENY IS NOT KNOWN.

Emília P Martins1.   

Abstract

A method is proposed to conduct phylogenetic analyses of comparative or interspecific data when the true phylogeny is not known. Standard models of speciation and/or extinction or other methods are used to generate a sample from the set of all possible phylogenies for the measured species. The comparative data are then analyzed on each of the possible trees to obtain a distribution of possible evolutionary statistics for these data. The mean of this distribution is proposed as a reasonable estimate of the true evolutionary statistic of interest. Ways of obtaining confidence intervals and of developing hypothesis tests for this mean statistic are also proposed. The method can be used with any comparative method or phylogenetic analysis technique when phylogenetic relationships among species are not known or when branch lengths for a phylogeny in units of expected character change (as required by most methods) are not available. Computer programs to conduct the analyses are available on request. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Comparative method; computer simulation; phylogeny; speciation; statistics; systematics

Year:  1996        PMID: 28568876     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Chasing the Patagonian sun: comparative thermal biology of Liolaemus lizards.

Authors:  Débora Lina Moreno Azócar; Bieke Vanhooydonck; Marcelo F Bonino; M Gabriela Perotti; Cristian S Abdala; James A Schulte; Félix B Cruz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Modeling body size evolution in Felidae under alternative phylogenetic hypotheses.

Authors:  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; João Carlos Nabout
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  An exploration of differences in the scaling of life history traits with body mass within reptiles and between amniotes.

Authors:  Konstantin Hallmann; Eva Maria Griebeler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Assesment and interpretation of negative forelimb allometry in the evolution of non-avian Theropoda.

Authors:  José A Palma Liberona; Sergio Soto-Acuña; Marco A Mendez; Alexander O Vargas
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.