Literature DB >> 28568790

THE MAINTENANCE OF GYNODIOECY AND ANDRODIOECY IN A METAPOPULATION.

John Pannell1.   

Abstract

Males and females are at a selective disadvantage relative to hermaphrodites (cosexuals) in species with a colonizing habit, as only cosexuals are able to establish new colonies on their own. The implications of this disadvantage are assessed by means of a computer model of metapopulation dynamics, in which individual colonies are established through different rates of immigration and suffer different rates of local extinction. Results are given for simulations of an island model, a stepping-stone model, and for a partial analysis of the island model with simplifying assumptions. It is shown that: (1) unisexual frequencies in a metapopulation can be reasonably approximated by a linear function of the logarithm of the ratio of the immigration rate to the colony extinction rate; (2) metapopulation dynamics favor the maintenance of females (gynodioecy) over males (androdioecy) with cosexuals when they would otherwise be equally likely in a panmictic situation; (3) the way in which extinction and immigration rates affect unisexual frequencies at metapopulation equilibrium interacts with whether sterility is determined by a dominant or a recessive allele; and (4) unisexual frequencies are affected in a qualitatively similar way by the dynamics of a metapopulation when cosexuals are self-incompatible to when they are self-compatible, although only in the former case are high frequencies of unisexuals maintained when extinction and colonization rates approach the threshold at which the metapopulation goes extinct. These results are discussed with reference to existing data from species with nuclear male or female sterility. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baker's Law; cellular automata; computer model; dioecy; dispersal; extinction; reproductive assurance; self-incompatibility

Year:  1997        PMID: 28568790     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02383.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Nuclear androdioecy and gynodioecy.

Authors:  J A Vargas; R F del Castillo
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 2.  Males, Outcrossing, and Sexual Selection in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Levi T Morran; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A new biological species in the Mercurialis annua polyploid complex: functional divergence in inflorescence morphology and hybrid sterility.

Authors:  Wen-Juan Ma; Luis Santos Del Blanco; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Low siring success of females with an acquired male function illustrates the legacy of sexual dimorphism in constraining the breakdown of dioecy.

Authors:  Luis Santos Del Blanco; Eleri Tudor; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Recurrent allopolyploidization, Y-chromosome introgression and the evolution of sexual systems in the plant genus Mercurialis.

Authors:  J F Gerchen; P Veltsos; J R Pannell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Sexual morph specialisation in a trioecious nematode balances opposing selective forces.

Authors:  Sally Adams; Prachi Pathak; Maike Kittelmann; Alun R C Jones; Eamonn B Mallon; Andre Pires-daSilva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The opposing effects of genetic drift and Haldane's sieve on floral-morph frequencies in tristylous metapopulations.

Authors:  Camille Roux; John R Pannell
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  The integrative biology of genetic dominance.

Authors:  Sylvain Billiard; Vincent Castric; Violaine Llaurens
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2021-08-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.