Literature DB >> 28568724

THE SKELETON SPACE: A FINITE SET OF ORGANIC DESIGNS.

R D K Thomas1, W-E Reif2.   

Abstract

The structures of animal skeletons converge repeatedly on a limited number of architectural designs that can be constructed by growing organisms and that are functionally viable, although often not optimal. Properties of materials, construction rules that determine patterns of development, and physical constraints exerted by the requirements of function suggest that organic structure must necessarily approach these recurrent elements of design. A set of potential designs for the elements of animal skeletons is derived in terms of geometric and construction rules and the properties of materials. Skeletons of actual living and extinct organisms are matched with the possibilities defined within this theoretical morphospace. This provides a metric of skeletal complexity and of the extent to which various groups of animals have been able to exploit the range of possibilities of organic structure. These analyses show that the most evolutionarily advanced animals within a given phylum do not have the most complex skeletons; that arthropods are less morphologically diverse than vertebrates and molluscs; that the physical constraints of life on land and in the air substantially limit the variety of skeletal structures suitable for life in these environments; and that overall the range of possible skeletal designs has been very fully exploited by living and extinct organisms. These results strongly support the hypothesis that the essential elements of organic design are inherent in the material properties of the universe. The organizational properties of animal skeletons suggest that their design elements are fixed point attractors, structures that we characterize as topological attractors that evolution cannot avoid. © 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal skeletons; complexity; constructional morphology; morphology; organic design; structural diversity; theoretical morphology

Year:  1993        PMID: 28568724     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02098.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

Review 1.  Forbidden phenotypes and the limits of evolution.

Authors:  Geerat J Vermeij
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  What does convergent evolution mean? The interpretation of convergence and its implications in the search for limits to evolution.

Authors:  C Tristan Stayton
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  Finding the way in phenotypic space: the origin and maintenance of constraints on organismal form.

Authors:  Massimo Pigliucci
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Correlates and catalysts of hominin evolution in Africa.

Authors:  Jeffrey K McKee
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  Phenotypic systems biology for organisms: Concepts, methods and case studies.

Authors:  Takao K Suzuki
Journal:  Biophys Physicobiol       Date:  2022-04-05

6.  Masticatory Apparatus Performance and Functional Morphology in the Extremely Large Mice from Gough Island.

Authors:  Michelle D Parmenter; Jacob P Nelson; Sara E Weigel; Melissa M Gray; Bret A Payseur; Christopher J Vinyard
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 7.  The topology of evolutionary novelty and innovation in macroevolution.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Testing adaptive hypotheses of convergence with functional landscapes: a case study of bone-cracking hypercarnivores.

Authors:  Zhijie Jack Tseng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.