Literature DB >> 28568659

USING PHYLOGENETIC TREES TO STUDY SPECIATION AND EXTINCTION.

Jody Hey1.   

Abstract

One tool in the study of the forces that determine species diversity is the null, or simple, model. The fit of predictions to observations, good or bad, leads to a useful paradigm or to knowledge of forces not accounted for, respectively. It is shown how simple models of speciation and extinction lead directly to predictions of the structure of phylogenetic trees. These predictions include both essential attributes of phylogenetic trees: lengths, in the form of internode distances; and topology, in the form of internode links. These models also lead directly to statistical tests which can be used to compare predictions with phylogenetic trees that are estimated from data. Two different models and eight data sets are considered. A model without species extinction consistently yielded predictions closer to observations than did a model that included extinction. It is proposed that it may be useful to think of the diversification of recently formed monophyletic groups as a random speciation process without extinction. © 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Coalescent; extinction molecular clock; null model; speciation; species diversity

Year:  1992        PMID: 28568659     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Genealogy-dependent variation in viability among self-incompatibility genotypes.

Authors:  Marcy K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  A null model for microbial diversification.

Authors:  Timothy J Straub; Olga Zhaxybayeva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Limited by the roof of the world: mountain radiations of Apollo swallowtails controlled by diversity-dependence processes.

Authors:  Fabien L Condamine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Viral phylodynamics and the search for an 'effective number of infections'.

Authors:  Simon D W Frost; Erik M Volz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  BIO::Phylo-phyloinformatic analysis using perl.

Authors:  Rutger A Vos; Jason Caravas; Klaas Hartmann; Mark A Jensen; Chase Miller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Phylogenetically clustered extinction risks do not substantially prune the Tree of Life.

Authors:  Rakesh K Parhar; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimating shifts in diversification rates based on higher-level phylogenies.

Authors:  Tanja Stadler; Jana Smrckova
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Universal artifacts affect the branching of phylogenetic trees, not universal scaling laws.

Authors:  Cristian R Altaba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets.

Authors:  Tomochika Fujisawa; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 10.  Visualizing time-related data in biology, a review.

Authors:  Maria Secrier; Reinhard Schneider
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 11.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.