Literature DB >> 28568579

BODY SIZE AND SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN MARINE IGUANAS FLUCTUATE AS A RESULT OF OPPOSING NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: AN ISLAND COMPARISON.

Martin Wikelski1,2, Fritz Trillmich1.   

Abstract

Body size is often assumed to represent the outcome of conflicting selection pressures of natural and sexual selection. Marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus) populations in the Galápagos exhibit 10-fold differences in body mass between island populations. There is also strong sexual size dimorphism, with males being about twice as heavy as females. To understand the evolutionary processes shaping body size in marine iguanas, we analyzed the selection differentials on body size in two island populations (max. male mass 900 g in Genovesa, 3500 g in Santa Fé). Factors that usually confound any evolutionary analysis of body sizes-predation, interspecific food competition, reproductive role division-are ruled out for marine iguanas. We show that, above hatchlings, mortality rates increased with body size in both sexes to the same extent. This effect was independent of individual age. The largest animals (males) of each island were the first to die once environmental conditions deteriorated (e.g., during El Niños). This sex-biased mortality was the result of sexual size dimorphism, but at the same time caused sexual size dimorphism to fluctuate. Mortality differed between seasons (selection differentials as low as -1.4) and acted on different absolute body sizes between islands. Both males and females did not cease growth when an optimal body size for survival was reached, as demonstrated by the fact that individual adult body size phenotypically increased in each population under favorable environmental conditions beyond naturally selected limits. But why did marine iguanas grow "too large" for survival? Due to lek mating, sexual selection constantly favored large body size in males (selection differentials up to +0.77). Females only need to reach a body size sufficient to produce surviving offspring. Thereafter, large body size of females was less favored by fertility selection than large size in males. Resulting from these different selection pressures on male and female size, sexual size dimorphism was mechanistically caused by the fact that females matured at an earlier age and size than males, whereafter they constantly allocated resources into eggs, which slowed growth. The observed allometric increase in sexual size dimorphism is explained by the fact that the difference between these selective processes becomes larger as energy abundance in the environment increases. Because body size is generally highly heritable, these selective processes are expected to lead to genetic differences in body size between islands. We propose a common-garden experiment to determine the influence of genetic factors and phenotypic reaction norms of final body size. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Amblyrhynchus cristatus; Galápagos; body size; growth; mortality; natural selection; phenotypic plasticity; sexual selection; sexual size dimorphism

Year:  1997        PMID: 28568579     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Stress physiology as a predictor of survival in Galapagos marine iguanas.

Authors:  L Michael Romero; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Drought survival and reproduction impose contrasting selection pressures on maximum body size and sexual size dimorphism in a snake, Seminatrix pygaea.

Authors:  Christopher T Winne; John D Willson; J Whitfield Gibbons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Corticosterone levels predict survival probabilities of Galapagos marine iguanas during El Nino events.

Authors:  L M Romero; M Wikelski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ecological and evolutionary influences on body size and shape in the Galápagos marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus).

Authors:  Ylenia Chiari; Scott Glaberman; Pedro Tarroso; Adalgisa Caccone; Julien Claude
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Trade-offs between growth and maturation: the cost of reproduction for surviving environmental extremes.

Authors:  Thomas M Luhring; Ricardo M Holdo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Judit Mokos; István Scheuring; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Species-specific evolution of class I MHC genes in iguanas (order: Squamata; subfamily: Iguaninae).

Authors:  Scott Glaberman; Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  Life-history and spatial determinants of somatic growth dynamics in Komodo dragon populations.

Authors:  Rebecca J Laver; Deni Purwandana; Achmad Ariefiandy; Jeri Imansyah; David Forsyth; Claudio Ciofi; Tim S Jessop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spatial ecology of the critically endangered Fijian crested iguana, Brachylophus vitiensis, in an extremely dense population: implications for conservation.

Authors:  Suzanne F Morrison; Pita Biciloa; Peter S Harlow; J Scott Keogh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Supplementation of male pheromone on rock substrates attracts female rock lizards to the territories of males: a field experiment.

Authors:  José Martín; Pilar López
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.